176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23737234)
1. Current clinical evidence for remote patient management.
Guédon-Moreau L; Mabo P; Kacet S
Europace; 2013 Jun; 15 Suppl 1():i6-i10. PubMed ID: 23737234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Disease management: atrial fibrillation and home monitoring.
Ricci RP
Europace; 2013 Jun; 15 Suppl 1():i35-i39. PubMed ID: 23737228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic remote monitoring: is there a need?
Varma N; Brugada P
Europace; 2013 Jun; 15 Suppl 1():i1-i2. PubMed ID: 23737221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Remote monitoring as a key innovation in the management of cardiac patients including those with implantable electronic devices.
Sutton R
Europace; 2013 Jun; 15 Suppl 1():i3-i5. PubMed ID: 23737226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic remote monitoring: milestones reached, paths to pave.
Varma N; Brugada P
Europace; 2013 Jun; 15 Suppl 1():i69-i71. PubMed ID: 23737236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable devices in the Asia-Pacific.
Lau CP; Zhang S
Europace; 2013 Jun; 15 Suppl 1():i65-i68. PubMed ID: 23737235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost efficiency and reimbursement of remote monitoring: a US perspective.
Slotwiner D; Wilkoff B
Europace; 2013 Jun; 15 Suppl 1():i54-i58. PubMed ID: 23737232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential role of home monitoring to reduce inappropriate shocks in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients due to lead failure.
Spencker S; Coban N; Koch L; Schirdewan A; Müller D
Europace; 2009 Apr; 11(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 19103654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized study of remote monitoring and fluid monitoring for the management of patients with implanted cardiac arrhythmia devices.
Lüthje L; Vollmann D; Seegers J; Sohns C; Hasenfuß G; Zabel M
Europace; 2015 Aug; 17(8):1276-81. PubMed ID: 25983310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Remote follow-up and continuous remote monitoring, distinguished.
Burri H
Europace; 2013 Jun; 15 Suppl 1():i14-i16. PubMed ID: 23737223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decreased delivery of inappropriate shocks achieved by remote monitoring of ICD: a substudy of the ECOST trial.
Guédon-Moreau L; Kouakam C; Klug D; Marquié C; Brigadeau F; Boulé S; Blangy H; Lacroix D; Clémenty J; Sadoul N; Kacet S
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2014 Jul; 25(7):763-70. PubMed ID: 24602062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monitoring in the management of atrial fibrillation.
Lewalter T; Morgan J; Halimi F; Lip G; Dagres N; Blomström-Lundqvist C;
Europace; 2012 Apr; 14(4):591-2. PubMed ID: 22454456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Remote monitoring reduces healthcare use and improves quality of care in heart failure patients with implantable defibrillators: the evolution of management strategies of heart failure patients with implantable defibrillators (EVOLVO) study.
Landolina M; Perego GB; Lunati M; Curnis A; Guenzati G; Vicentini A; Parati G; Borghi G; Zanaboni P; Valsecchi S; Marzegalli M
Circulation; 2012 Jun; 125(24):2985-92. PubMed ID: 22626743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Remote, wireless, ambulatory monitoring of implantable pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy systems: analysis of a worldwide database.
Lazarus A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2007 Jan; 30 Suppl 1():S2-S12. PubMed ID: 17302706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Remote management of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: an application of telemedicine].
Ganière V; Burri H
Rev Med Suisse; 2011 Mar; 7(285):548-50, 552-3. PubMed ID: 21488395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Device-based remote monitoring : Current evidence].
Duncker D; Michalski R; Müller-Leisse J; Zormpas C; König T; Veltmann C
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2017 Sep; 28(3):268-278. PubMed ID: 28812129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In-hospital follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillator and pacemaker carriers: patients' inconvenience and points of view. A four-hospital Italian survey.
Gramegna L; Tomasi C; Gasparini G; Scaboro G; Zanon F; Boaretto G; Tomei R; Tomasi L
Europace; 2012 Mar; 14(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 22080472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rationale and design of a prospective study of the efficacy of a remote monitoring system used in implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up Study (TRUST) study.
Varma N
Am Heart J; 2007 Dec; 154(6):1029-34. PubMed ID: 18035071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Workflow, time and patient satisfaction from the perspectives of home monitoring.
Ricci RP; Morichelli L
Europace; 2013 Jun; 15 Suppl 1():i49-i53. PubMed ID: 23737231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical and practical aspects of remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients in Poland - preliminary results.
Przybylski A; Zakrzewska-Koperska J; Maciag A; Derejko P; Orczykowski M; Szumowski L; Walczak F
Kardiol Pol; 2009 May; 67(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 19521935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
