These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
62. The long-term results of speech perception in elderly cochlear implant users. Jolink C; Helleman HW; van Spronsen E; Ebbens FA; Ravesloot MJ; Dreschler WA Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 May; 17(3):146-50. PubMed ID: 27078518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Effects of Age and Implanted Ear on Speech Recognition in Adults with Unilateral Cochlear Implants. Sharpe RA; Camposeo EL; Muzaffar WK; Holcomb MA; Dubno JR; Meyer TA Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(4):223-230. PubMed ID: 27450677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Mobile and landline telephone performance outcomes among telephone-using cochlear implant recipients. Tan BY; Gluth MB; Statham EL; Eikelboom RH; Atlas MD Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Feb; 146(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 21969279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. The influence of cochlear implant electrode position on performance. van der Marel KS; Briaire JJ; Verbist BM; Muurling TJ; Frijns JH Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(3):202-11. PubMed ID: 25924706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Gender categorization in cochlear implant users. Massida Z; Marx M; Belin P; James C; Fraysse B; Barone P; Deguine O J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1389-401. PubMed ID: 24023381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients. Blamey P; Artieres F; Başkent D; Bergeron F; Beynon A; Burke E; Dillier N; Dowell R; Fraysse B; Gallégo S; Govaerts PJ; Green K; Huber AM; Kleine-Punte A; Maat B; Marx M; Mawman D; Mosnier I; O'Connor AF; O'Leary S; Rousset A; Schauwers K; Skarzynski H; Skarzynski PH; Sterkers O; Terranti A; Truy E; Van de Heyning P; Venail F; Vincent C; Lazard DS Audiol Neurootol; 2013; 18(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 23095305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Speech Production Quality of Cochlear Implant Users with Respect to Duration and Onset of Hearing Loss. Ruff S; Bocklet T; Nöth E; Müller J; Hoster E; Schuster M ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2017; 79(5):282-294. PubMed ID: 29131113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. [Coping strategies in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant users in comparison to the hearing population]. Kobosko J; Pankowska A; Skarżyński H Otolaryngol Pol; 2012; 66(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 22500504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Speech perception scores in cochlear implant recipients: An analysis of ceiling effects in the CUNY sentence test (Quiet) in post-lingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. Ebrahimi-Madiseh A; Eikelboom RH; Jayakody DM; Atlas MD Cochlear Implants Int; 2016; 17(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 26841858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. [COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION IN ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS: INSIGHTS BASED ON A RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION]. Luntz M; Yehudai N; Most T; Shpak T Harefuah; 2015 Dec; 154(12):761-5, 805. PubMed ID: 26897776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Choice of ear for cochlear implantation: the effect of history and residual hearing on predicted postoperative performance. Friedland DR; Venick HS; Niparko JK Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jul; 24(4):582-9. PubMed ID: 12851549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Factors that influence outcomes in cochlear implantation in adults, based on patient-related characteristics - a retrospective study. Kraaijenga VJ; Smit AL; Stegeman I; Smilde JJ; van Zanten GA; Grolman W Clin Otolaryngol; 2016 Oct; 41(5):585-92. PubMed ID: 26493690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Is there an age limit for cochlear implantation? Sanchez-Cuadrado I; Lassaletta L; Perez-Mora RM; Zernotti M; Di Gregorio MF; Boccio C; Gavilán J Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2013 Apr; 122(4):222-8. PubMed ID: 23697318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Round window electrocochleography and speech perception outcomes in adult cochlear implant subjects: comparison with audiometric and biographical information. McClellan JH; Formeister EJ; Merwin WH; Dillon MT; Calloway N; Iseli C; Buchman CA; Fitzpatrick DC; Adunka OF Otol Neurotol; 2014 Oct; 35(9):e245-52. PubMed ID: 25118584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Cochlear Implant Results in Older Adults with Post-Lingual Deafness: The Role of "Top-Down" Neurocognitive Mechanisms. Zucca M; Albera A; Albera R; Montuschi C; Della Gatta B; Canale A; Rainero I Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Rehabilitation and Psychosocial Determinants of Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Older Adults. Tang L; Thompson CB; Clark JH; Ceh KM; Yeagle JD; Francis HW Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):663-671. PubMed ID: 28542018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Evaluation of the 'Fitting to Outcomes eXpert' (FOX®) with established cochlear implant users. Buechner A; Vaerenberg B; Gazibegovic D; Brendel M; De Ceulaer G; Govaerts P; Lenarz T Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jan; 16(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 24950595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Value of pre-operative caloric test in predicting speech perception after cochlear implantation in adults with post-lingual hearing loss. Yang CJ; Lee JY; Ahn JH; Lee KS Acta Otolaryngol; 2016 Sep; 136(9):912-8. PubMed ID: 27151170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]