522 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23738706)
1. Unique clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma and poor prognostic indicators.
Song Y; Liu X; Zhang G; Song H; Ren Y; He X; Wang Y; Zhang J; Zhang Y; Sun S; Liang X; Sun Q; Pang D
World J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 11():129. PubMed ID: 23738706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of outcomes and novel immune biomarkers in metaplastic breast cancer: a single institution retrospective study.
Morgan E; Suresh A; Ganju A; Stover DG; Wesolowski R; Sardesai S; Noonan A; Reinbolt R; VanDeusen J; Williams N; Cherian MA; Li Z; Young G; Palettas M; Stephens J; Liu J; Luff A; Ramaswamy B; Lustberg M
World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Jan; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 31937323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hormone receptor status does not affect prognosis in metaplastic breast cancer: a population-based analysis with comparison to infiltrating ductal and lobular carcinomas.
Paul Wright G; Davis AT; Koehler TJ; Melnik MK; Chung MH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(11):3497-503. PubMed ID: 24838367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metaplastic Carcinoma of the Breast Is More Aggressive Than Triple-negative Breast Cancer: A Study From a Single Institution and Review of Literature.
El Zein D; Hughes M; Kumar S; Peng X; Oyasiji T; Jabbour H; Khoury T
Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Aug; 17(5):382-391. PubMed ID: 28529029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relation between Ki-67, ER, PR, Her2/neu, p21, EGFR, and TOP II-α expression in invasive ductal breast cancer patients and correlations with prognosis.
Yan J; Liu XL; Han LZ; Xiao G; Li NL; Deng YN; Yin LC; Ling LJ; Yu XY; Tan CL; Huang XP; Liu LX
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(2):823-9. PubMed ID: 25684532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ki67 Frequency in Breast Cancers without Axillary Lymph Node Involvement and its Relation with Disease-free Survival.
Shandiz FH; Shabahang H; Afzaljavan F; Sharifi N; Tavasoli A; Afzalaghaee M; Roshanzamir E; Pasdar A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(3):1347-50. PubMed ID: 27039770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The prognoses of metaplastic breast cancer patients compared to those of triple-negative breast cancer patients.
Bae SY; Lee SK; Koo MY; Hur SM; Choi MY; Cho DH; Kim S; Choe JH; Lee JE; Kim JH; Kim JS; Nam SJ; Yang JH
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Apr; 126(2):471-8. PubMed ID: 21287362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early and Locally Advanced Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Presentation and Survival by Receptor Status in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 2010-2014.
Schroeder MC; Rastogi P; Geyer CE; Miller LD; Thomas A
Oncologist; 2018 Apr; 23(4):481-488. PubMed ID: 29330212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative prognostic analysis for triple-negative breast cancer with metaplastic and invasive ductal carcinoma.
Li Y; Zhang N; Zhang H; Yang Q
J Clin Pathol; 2019 Jun; 72(6):418-424. PubMed ID: 30872384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences of Clinicopathological Features between Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma and Nonspecific Invasive Breast Carcinoma and Prognostic Profile of Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma.
Qiu Y; Chen Y; Zhu L; Chen H; Dai Y; Bao B; Tian L; Hao X; Wang J
Breast J; 2022; 2022():2500594. PubMed ID: 36051469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinicopathological features and prognosis of pregnancy associated breast cancer - a matched case control study.
Madaras L; Kovács KA; Szász AM; Kenessey I; Tőkés AM; Székely B; Baranyák Z; Kiss O; Dank M; Kulka J
Pathol Oncol Res; 2014 Jul; 20(3):581-90. PubMed ID: 24357159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinicopathologic characteristics at diagnosis and the survival of patients with medullary breast carcinoma in China: a comparison with infiltrating ductal carcinoma-not otherwise specified.
Cao AY; He M; Huang L; Shao ZM; Di GH
World J Surg Oncol; 2013 Apr; 11():91. PubMed ID: 23607710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The expression and clinical significance of the androgen receptor and E-cadherin in triple-negative breast cancer.
Tang D; Xu S; Zhang Q; Zhao W
Med Oncol; 2012 Jun; 29(2):526-33. PubMed ID: 21519872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinicopathological characteristics of metaplastic breast cancer - analysis of the basic immunohistochemical profile and comparison with other invasive breast cancer types.
Budzik MP; Patera J; Sobol M; Czerw AI; Deptała A; Badowska-Kozakiewicz AM
Breast; 2019 Feb; 43():135-141. PubMed ID: 30553188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors for Survival and Distribution of 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Patients With Pure Mucinous Breast Cancer: A SEER Population-Based Retrospective Analysis.
Ding S; Wu J; Lin C; Chen W; Li Y; Shen K; Zhu L
Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Feb; 19(1):e66-e73. PubMed ID: 30396812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metaplastic breast cancer: clinicopathological features and its prognosis.
Lee H; Jung SY; Ro JY; Kwon Y; Sohn JH; Park IH; Lee KS; Lee S; Kim SW; Kang HS; Ko KL; Ro J
J Clin Pathol; 2012 May; 65(5):441-6. PubMed ID: 22412048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Worse prognosis of metaplastic breast cancer patients than other patients with triple-negative breast cancer.
Jung SY; Kim HY; Nam BH; Min SY; Lee SJ; Park C; Kwon Y; Kim EA; Ko KL; Shin KH; Lee KS; Park IH; Lee S; Kim SW; Kang HS; Ro J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Apr; 120(3):627-37. PubMed ID: 20143153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer: histologic subtyping to inform the outcome.
Montagna E; Maisonneuve P; Rotmensz N; Cancello G; Iorfida M; Balduzzi A; Galimberti V; Veronesi P; Luini A; Pruneri G; Bottiglieri L; Mastropasqua MG; Goldhirsch A; Viale G; Colleoni M
Clin Breast Cancer; 2013 Feb; 13(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 23098574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Molecular Typing and Identification of Potential Targeted Therapies at a Single Institution.
Edenfield J; Schammel C; Collins J; Schammel D; Edenfield WJ
Clin Breast Cancer; 2017 Feb; 17(1):e1-e10. PubMed ID: 27568101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Back to Basics: Traditional Nottingham Grade Mitotic Counts Alone are Significant in Predicting Survival in Invasive Breast Carcinoma.
Chang JM; McCullough AE; Dueck AC; Kosiorek HE; Ocal IT; Lidner TK; Gray RJ; Wasif N; Northfelt DW; Anderson KS; Pockaj BA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3():S509-15. PubMed ID: 26001860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
