These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23739470)

  • 1. Anaerobic digestion of agricultural and other substrates--implications for greenhouse gas emissions.
    Pucker J; Jungmeier G; Siegl S; Pötsch EM
    Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():283-91. PubMed ID: 23739470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CO2 abatement costs of greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation by different biogas conversion pathways.
    Rehl T; Müller J
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Jan; 114():13-25. PubMed ID: 23201601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks: impact on energetic and environmental balances of biogas process.
    Bacenetti J; Negri M; Fiala M; González-García S
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Oct; 463-464():541-51. PubMed ID: 23831800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The potential of bio-methane as bio-fuel/bio-energy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions: a qualitative assessment for Europe in a life cycle perspective.
    Tilche A; Galatola M
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(11):1683-92. PubMed ID: 18547917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Climate balance of biogas upgrading systems.
    Pertl A; Mostbauer P; Obersteiner G
    Waste Manag; 2010 Jan; 30(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 19783421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Greenhouse gas emissions from forestry operations: a life cycle assessment.
    Sonne E
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(4):1439-50. PubMed ID: 16825464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mitigating the environmental impacts of milk production via anaerobic digestion of manure: case study of a dairy farm in the Po Valley.
    Battini F; Agostini A; Boulamanti AK; Giuntoli J; Amaducci S
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 481():196-208. PubMed ID: 24598150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Techno-economic evaluation of GHG emissions mitigation of biomethane upgrading technologies.
    Agostini A; Buffi M; Hurtig O; Carbone C; Zanoni F; Monteleone G
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Jul; 364():121459. PubMed ID: 38870798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in greenhouse gas balance and resource demand of biogas plants in southern Germany after a period of three years.
    Bachmaier H; Effenberger M; Gronauer A; Boxberger J
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Apr; 31(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 23129609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions during wastewater treatment for agricultural use.
    Fine P; Hadas E
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Feb; 416():289-99. PubMed ID: 22209373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Life cycle assessment of energy self-sufficiency systems based on agricultural residues for organic arable farms.
    Kimming M; Sundberg C; Nordberg A; Baky A; Bernesson S; Norén O; Hansson PA
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):1425-32. PubMed ID: 20970998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biogas production: current state and perspectives.
    Weiland P
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Jan; 85(4):849-60. PubMed ID: 19777226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from 10 biogas plants within the agricultural sector.
    Liebetrau J; Reinelt T; Clemens J; Hafermann C; Friehe J; Weiland P
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(6):1370-9. PubMed ID: 23508164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Upgraded biogas from municipal solid waste for natural gas substitution and CO2 reduction--a case study of Austria, Italy, and Spain.
    Starr K; Villalba G; Gabarrell X
    Waste Manag; 2015 Apr; 38():105-16. PubMed ID: 25655352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Environmental balance of the UK biogas sector: An evaluation by consequential life cycle assessment.
    Styles D; Dominguez EM; Chadwick D
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Aug; 560-561():241-53. PubMed ID: 27101461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Greenhouse gas production in wastewater treatment: process selection is the major factor.
    Keller J; Hartley K
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):43-8. PubMed ID: 12926668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Green cheese: partial life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and energy intensity of integrated dairy production and bioenergy systems.
    Aguirre-Villegas HA; Passos-Fonseca TH; Reinemann DJ; Armentano LE; Wattiaux MA; Cabrera VE; Norman JM; Larson R
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Mar; 98(3):1571-92. PubMed ID: 25597974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The potential of Turkey's province-based livestock sector to mitigate GHG emissions through biogas production.
    Ersoy E; Ugurlu A
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Feb; 255():109858. PubMed ID: 32063318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Agricultural soil greenhouse gas emissions: a review of national inventory methods.
    Lokupitiya E; Paustian K
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(4):1413-27. PubMed ID: 16825462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of greenhouse gas generation in wastewater treatment plants--model development and application.
    Bani Shahabadi M; Yerushalmi L; Haghighat F
    Chemosphere; 2010 Feb; 78(9):1085-92. PubMed ID: 20110104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.