157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2373948)
1. A study of breast cancer screening: laurel County.
Fletcher ME; Blondell RD; Mader DR
J Ky Med Assoc; 1990 Jul; 88(7):343-4. PubMed ID: 2373948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. An effective way to reduce mortality. Screening for malignant breast disease.
Aspinall V
Prof Nurse; 1991 Feb; 6(5):283-4, 286-7. PubMed ID: 2000421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening for breast cancer: how useful are clinical breast examinations?
Baines CJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Jun; 92(12):958-9. PubMed ID: 10861299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Search for effective means in the early detection of breast cancer].
Pavlov KA; Semiglazov VF; Chernomordikova MF
Vopr Onkol; 1981; 27(8):26-9. PubMed ID: 7281589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identification and screening of women at high risk of breast cancer.
Krischer JP; Cook B; Weiner RS
Cancer Detect Prev; 1988; 13(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 3224347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammogram debate flares up: Latest breast cancer screening study fuels controversy.
Printz C
Cancer; 2014 Jun; 120(12):1755-6. PubMed ID: 24895263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer screening.
Milbrath JR; Moskowitz M; Bauermeister D
Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1981; 16(3):181-218. PubMed ID: 6268356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. For breast cancer screening, there is room for improvement, report concludes.
Randal J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Aug; 96(16):1200-1. PubMed ID: 15316051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Mass screening for early breast cancer].
Morimoto T; Komaki K
Nihon Rinsho; 1989 May; 47(5):1006-11. PubMed ID: 2746894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of breast consistency at palpation with breast density at mammography.
Boren WL; Hunter TB; Bjelland JC; Hunt KR
Invest Radiol; 1990 Sep; 25(9):1010-1. PubMed ID: 2211041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The controversy of mammography screening.
Kopans DB
Adm Radiol; 1995 Jan; 14(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 10141106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for cervical and breast cancer--southeastern Kentucky.
Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1988 Jan; 36(52):845-9. PubMed ID: 3122000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Risks of false-positive breast cancer screening results.
Levine D; French L
J Fam Pract; 1998 Jul; 47(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 9673600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast cancer screening. Making sense of controversies.
Treinen AD
Adv Nurse Pract; 1997 May; 5(5):16-8, 21-3. PubMed ID: 9459909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Leads from the MMWR. Screening for cervical and breast cancer--southeastern Kentucky.
JAMA; 1988 Feb; 259(8):1141-2. PubMed ID: 3339815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Mammography].
Grégoire A; Bernard C; Lavallée G; Morin C; Philie M
Union Med Can; 1992; 121(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 1413293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What are the benefits and costs of screening mammograms on Kentucky women aged 40-49?
Spratt JS; Gaines BM; Aaron WS; Cerrito P
J Surg Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 8888797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Breast cancer screening].
Cauche R
Soins; 1990 Feb; (533):37-42. PubMed ID: 2321058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Work-up of the abnormal mammogram for palpable and nonpalpable breast masses.
Schepps B; Spencer PK; Scola FH; Thompson W
R I Med; 1992 Jan; 75(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 1543887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference on Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40-49. Proceedings. Bethesda, Maryland, USA. January 21-23, 1997.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):vii-xviii, 1-156. PubMed ID: 9741961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
