These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23739485)

  • 1. Farm-specific carbon footprinting to the farm gate for agricultural co-products using the OVERSEER® model.
    Wheeler DM; Ledgard SF; Boyes M
    Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():437-43. PubMed ID: 23739485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.
    Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4641-55. PubMed ID: 22952361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment.
    Rotz CA; Montes F; Chianese DS
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Mar; 93(3):1266-82. PubMed ID: 20172247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends in greenhouse gas emissions from consumption and production of animal food products - implications for long-term climate targets.
    Cederberg C; Hedenus F; Wirsenius S; Sonesson U
    Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):330-40. PubMed ID: 23031741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from the Australian vegetables industry.
    Maraseni TN; Cockfield G; Maroulis J; Chen G
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2010 Aug; 45(6):578-88. PubMed ID: 20661792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Greenhouse gas emissions from forestry operations: a life cycle assessment.
    Sonne E
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(4):1439-50. PubMed ID: 16825464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms.
    O'Brien D; Capper JL; Garnsworthy PC; Grainger C; Shalloo L
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1835-51. PubMed ID: 24440256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Growth-promoting technologies decrease the carbon footprint, ammonia emissions, and costs of California beef production systems.
    Stackhouse KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4656-65. PubMed ID: 22952364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of strain of Holstein-Friesian cow and feeding system on greenhouse gas emissions from pastoral dairy farms.
    O'Brien D; Shalloo L; Grainger C; Buckley F; Horan B; Wallace M
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Jul; 93(7):3390-402. PubMed ID: 20630255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Carbon footprint of Canadian dairy products: calculations and issues.
    Vergé XP; Maxime D; Dyer JA; Desjardins RL; Arcand Y; Vanderzaag A
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Sep; 96(9):6091-104. PubMed ID: 23831091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Carbon footprint of dairy goat milk production in New Zealand.
    Robertson K; Symes W; Garnham M
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jul; 98(7):4279-93. PubMed ID: 25981064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. LIFE BEEF CARBON: a common framework for quantifying grass and corn based beef farms' carbon footprints.
    O'Brien D; Herron J; Andurand J; Caré S; Martinez P; Migliorati L; Moro M; Pirlo G; Dollé JB
    Animal; 2020 Apr; 14(4):834-845. PubMed ID: 31666147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of feed demand on greenhouse gas emissions and farm profitability for organic and conventional dairy farms.
    Kiefer L; Menzel F; Bahrs E
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Dec; 97(12):7564-74. PubMed ID: 25468708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of farm-level greenhouse gas emissions in transhumance and semi-intensive sheep production systems in continental rangelands.
    Ocak Yetişgin S; Morgan-Davies C; Önder H
    Animal; 2022 Aug; 16(8):100602. PubMed ID: 35952481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal, spatial, and management variability in the carbon footprint of New Zealand milk.
    Ledgard SF; Falconer SJ; Abercrombie R; Philip G; Hill JP
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):1031-1046. PubMed ID: 31759588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Life-cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from dairy production in Eastern Canada: a case study.
    Mc Geough EJ; Little SM; Janzen HH; McAllister TA; McGinn SM; Beauchemin KA
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Sep; 95(9):5164-5175. PubMed ID: 22916922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Carbon and blue water footprints of California sheep production.
    Dougherty HC; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM; DePeters EJ; Pettey LA; Macon D; Finzel J; Rodrigues K; Kebreab E
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Feb; 97(2):945-961. PubMed ID: 30452693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anaerobic digestion of agricultural and other substrates--implications for greenhouse gas emissions.
    Pucker J; Jungmeier G; Siegl S; Pötsch EM
    Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():283-91. PubMed ID: 23739470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimation of carbon footprint and sources of emissions of an extensive alpaca production system.
    Oquendo GG; Salazar-Cubillas K; Alvarado V; Gómez-Bravo CA
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2022 Sep; 54(5):331. PubMed ID: 36175796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Agricultural soil greenhouse gas emissions: a review of national inventory methods.
    Lokupitiya E; Paustian K
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(4):1413-27. PubMed ID: 16825462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.