These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23739485)

  • 21. Evaluation of the effect of accounting method, IPCC v. LCA, on grass-based and confinement dairy systems' greenhouse gas emissions.
    O'Brien D; Shalloo L; Patton J; Buckley F; Grainger C; Wallace M
    Animal; 2012 Sep; 6(9):1512-27. PubMed ID: 23031525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Carbon footprint of organic beef meat from farm to fork: a case study of short supply chain.
    Vitali A; Grossi G; Martino G; Bernabucci U; Nardone A; Lacetera N
    J Sci Food Agric; 2018 Nov; 98(14):5518-5524. PubMed ID: 29691877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Developments in greenhouse gas emissions and net energy use in Danish agriculture - how to achieve substantial CO(2) reductions?
    Dalgaard T; Olesen JE; Petersen SO; Petersen BM; Jørgensen U; Kristensen T; Hutchings NJ; Gyldenkærne S; Hermansen JE
    Environ Pollut; 2011 Nov; 159(11):3193-203. PubMed ID: 21454001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Agricultural opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.
    Johnson JM; Franzluebbers AJ; Weyers SL; Reicosky DC
    Environ Pollut; 2007 Nov; 150(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 17706849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of intensification of pastoral farming on greenhouse gas emissions in New Zealand.
    Pinares-Patino CS; Waghorn GC; Hegarty RS; Hoskin SO
    N Z Vet J; 2009 Oct; 57(5):252-61. PubMed ID: 19802038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An LCA researcher's wish list--data and emission models needed to improve LCA studies of animal production.
    Cederberg C; Henriksson M; Berglund M
    Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():212-9. PubMed ID: 23739464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The greenhouse emissions footprint of free-range eggs.
    Taylor RC; Omed H; Edwards-Jones G
    Poult Sci; 2014 Jan; 93(1):231-7. PubMed ID: 24570444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Greenhouse gas emission reduction and environmental quality improvement from implementation of aerobic waste treatment systems in swine farms.
    Vanotti MB; Szogi AA; Vives CA
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(4):759-66. PubMed ID: 18060761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Life cycle assessment of energy self-sufficiency systems based on agricultural residues for organic arable farms.
    Kimming M; Sundberg C; Nordberg A; Baky A; Bernesson S; Norén O; Hansson PA
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):1425-32. PubMed ID: 20970998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Urban and country level greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprints: A comparative study of a megacity, Delhi and India.
    Ganga S; Gurjar BR; Kumari R
    J Environ Sci Eng; 2011 Apr; 53(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 23033695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analytical methods for quantifying greenhouse gas flux in animal production systems.
    Powers W; Capelari M
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Aug; 94(8):3139-3146. PubMed ID: 27695815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The carbon footprint of integrated milk production and renewable energy systems - A case study.
    Vida E; Tedesco DEA
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 609():1286-1294. PubMed ID: 28793397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development and testing of a European Union-wide farm-level carbon calculator.
    Tuomisto HL; De Camillis C; Leip A; Nisini L; Pelletier N; Haastrup P
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Jul; 11(3):404-16. PubMed ID: 25655187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Climate change mitigation for agriculture: water quality benefits and costs.
    Wilcock R; Elliott S; Hudson N; Parkyn S; Quinn J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(11):2093-9. PubMed ID: 19092184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Modelling the interactions between C and N farm balances and GHG emissions from confinement dairy farms in northern Spain.
    Del Prado A; Mas K; Pardo G; Gallejones P
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Nov; 465():156-65. PubMed ID: 23601287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Contribution of milk production to global greenhouse gas emissions. An estimation based on typical farms.
    Hagemann M; Ndambi A; Hemme T; Latacz-Lohmann U
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2012 Feb; 19(2):390-402. PubMed ID: 21792583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Special topics--Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: III. A review of animal management mitigation options.
    Hristov AN; Ott T; Tricarico J; Rotz A; Waghorn G; Adesogan A; Dijkstra J; Montes F; Oh J; Kebreab E; Oosting SJ; Gerber PJ; Henderson B; Makkar HP; Firkins JL
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Nov; 91(11):5095-113. PubMed ID: 24045470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A regional assessment of the cost and effectiveness of mitigation measures for reducing nutrient losses to water and greenhouse gas emissions to air from pastoral farms.
    Vibart R; Vogeler I; Dennis S; Kaye-Blake W; Monaghan R; Burggraaf V; Beautrais J; Mackay A
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Jun; 156():276-89. PubMed ID: 25900091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Methods and consequences of including reduction in greenhouse gas emission in beef cattle multiple-trait selection.
    Barwick SA; Henzell AL; Herd RM; Walmsley BJ; Arthur PF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Apr; 51(1):18. PubMed ID: 31035930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in the production of fluid milk.
    Tomasula PM; Nutter DW
    Adv Food Nutr Res; 2011; 62():41-88. PubMed ID: 21504821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.