BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23739788)

  • 1. Effect of a cordless retraction paste on titanium surface: a topographic, chemical and biocompatibility evaluation.
    Cooper K; Bennani V; Tawse-Smith A; Reid M; Stirling C; Dias G
    Braz Oral Res; 2013; 27(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 23739788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of a cordless retraction paste material on implant surfaces: an in vitro study.
    Chang YS; Bennani V; Tawse-Smith A; Girvan L
    Braz Oral Res; 2011; 25(6):492-9. PubMed ID: 22147228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impression taking: still the key to great restorations.
    Miller MB
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(6):452-3. PubMed ID: 23220297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing biocompatibility of gingival fibroblasts and bacterial strains on a different modified titanium discs.
    Franková J; Pivodová V; Růžička F; Tománková K; Šafářová K; Vrbková J; Ulrichová J
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2013 Oct; 101(10):2915-24. PubMed ID: 23529774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of failed commercially pure titanium dental implants: a scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive spectrometer x-ray study.
    Shibli JA; Marcantonio E; d'Avila S; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
    J Periodontol; 2005 Jul; 76(7):1092-9. PubMed ID: 16018751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
    Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of gingival displacement cord and cordless systems on the closure, displacement, and inflammation of the gingival crevice.
    Chandra S; Singh A; Gupta KK; Chandra C; Arora V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Feb; 115(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 26443067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality.
    Acar Ö; Erkut S; Özçelik TB; Ozdemır E; Akçil M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 24360008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of titanium surface topography on morphology and in vitro activity of human gingival fibroblasts.
    Ramaglia L; Capece G; Di Spigna G; Bruno MP; Buonocore N; Postiglione L
    Minerva Stomatol; 2013; 62(7-8):267-80. PubMed ID: 24002563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of implantoplasty on the diameter, chemical surface composition, and biocompatibility of titanium implants.
    Schwarz F; John G; Becker J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Sep; 21(7):2355-2361. PubMed ID: 28012063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polysaccharide-protein surface modification of titanium via a layer-by-layer technique: characterization and cell behaviour aspects.
    Cai K; Rechtenbach A; Hao J; Bossert J; Jandt KD
    Biomaterials; 2005 Oct; 26(30):5960-71. PubMed ID: 15913761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of an air-powder abrasive system on plasma-sprayed titanium implant surfaces: an in vitro evaluation.
    Parham PL; Cobb CM; French AA; Love JW; Drisko CL; Killoy WJ
    J Oral Implantol; 1989; 15(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 2640245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the bioactivity of titanium after varied surface treatments using human osteosarcoma osteoblast cells: an in vitro study.
    Singh RG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):998-1003. PubMed ID: 22010082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-time cell analysis of the cytotoxicity of orthodontic mini-implants on human gingival fibroblasts and mouse osteoblasts.
    Malkoç S; Öztürk F; Çörekçi B; Bozkurt BS; Hakki SS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 22464523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of impression techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Chávez AM; Compagnoni MA; Molo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):715-21. PubMed ID: 20657866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface chemistry effects of topographic modification of titanium dental implant surfaces: 2. In vitro experiments.
    Cassinelli C; Morra M; Bruzzone G; Carpi A; Di Santi G; Giardino R; Fini M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 12608668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laser therapy accelerates initial attachment and subsequent behaviour of human oral fibroblasts cultured on titanium implant material. A scanning electron microscope and histomorphometric analysis.
    Khadra M; Kasem N; Lyngstadaas SP; Haanaes HR; Mustafa K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Apr; 16(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 15777326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On cobalt-chrome frameworks in implant dentistry.
    Hjalmarsson L
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2009; (201):3-83. PubMed ID: 20143574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.