These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23740688)

  • 1. Evaluation of a hot-wire hair removal device compared to razor shaving.
    Biesman BS
    Lasers Surg Med; 2013 Jul; 45(5):283-95. PubMed ID: 23740688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative assessment of growing hair counts, thickness and colour during and after treatments with a low-fluence, home-device laser: a randomized controlled trial.
    Thaysen-Petersen D; Barbet-Pfeilsticker M; Beerwerth F; Nash JF; Philipsen PA; Staubach P; Haedersdal M
    Br J Dermatol; 2015 Jan; 172(1):151-9. PubMed ID: 25039260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of long-pulsed alexandrite and Nd:YAG lasers, individually and in combination, for leg hair reduction: an assessor-blinded, randomized trial with 18 months of follow-up.
    Davoudi SM; Behnia F; Gorouhi F; Keshavarz S; Nassiri Kashani M; Rashighi Firoozabadi M; Firooz A
    Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1323-7. PubMed ID: 18936396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of a handheld self-treatment device for hair removal.
    Spencer JM
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2007 Aug; 6(8):788-92. PubMed ID: 17763608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Permanent hair reduction with a home-use diode laser: Safety and effectiveness 1 year after eight treatments.
    Wheeland RG
    Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Sep; 44(7):550-7. PubMed ID: 22886431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing 18- versus 12-mm spot size in hair removal using a gentlease 755-nm alexandrite laser.
    Nouri K; Chen H; Saghari S; Ricotti CA
    Dermatol Surg; 2004 Apr; 30(4 Pt 1):494-7. PubMed ID: 15056136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term clinical evaluation of a 800-nm long-pulsed diode laser with a large spot size and vacuum-assisted suction for hair removal.
    Ibrahimi OA; Kilmer SL
    Dermatol Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):912-7. PubMed ID: 22455549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized clinical trial on the comparison between hair shaving and snipping prior to laser hair removal sessions in women suffering from hirsutism.
    Alijanpour R; Aliakbarpour F
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2017 Mar; 16(1):70-75. PubMed ID: 27616192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the ruby 694 Chromos for hair removal in various skin sites.
    Allison KP; Kiernan MN; Waters RA; Clement RM
    Lasers Med Sci; 2003; 18(3):165-70. PubMed ID: 14505201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Photoepilation with a diode laser vs. intense pulsed light: a randomized, intrapatient left-to-right trial.
    Klein A; Steinert S; Baeumler W; Landthaler M; Babilas P
    Br J Dermatol; 2013 Jun; 168(6):1287-93. PubMed ID: 23278132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical study to determine the safety and efficacy of a low-energy, pulsed light device for home use hair removal.
    Elm CM; Wallander ID; Walgrave SE; Zelickson BD
    Lasers Surg Med; 2010 Apr; 42(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 20432276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser-assisted hair removal in pigmented skin: a clinical and histological evaluation.
    Alster TS; Bryan H; Williams CM
    Arch Dermatol; 2001 Jul; 137(7):885-9. PubMed ID: 11453807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of image analysis techniques for objective quantification of the efficacy of different hair removal methods.
    Bielfeldt S; Brandt M; Wilhelm KP
    J Cosmet Sci; 2006; 57(5):345-54. PubMed ID: 17111069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term Comparison of a Large Spot Vacuum Assisted Handpiece vs the Small Spot Size Traditional Handpiece of the 800 nm Diode Laser.
    Youssef NJ; Rizk AG; Ibrahimi OA; Tannous ZS
    J Drugs Dermatol; 2017 Sep; 16(9):893-898. PubMed ID: 28915284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of a novel low-energy pulsed-light device for home-use hair removal.
    Alster TS; Tanzi EL
    Dermatol Surg; 2009 Mar; 35(3):483-9. PubMed ID: 19292837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimizing treatment parameters for hair removal using a topical carbon-based solution and 1064-nm Q-switched neodymium:YAG laser energy.
    Nanni CA; Alster TS
    Arch Dermatol; 1997 Dec; 133(12):1546-9. PubMed ID: 9420539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical comparison of four hair removal lasers and light sources.
    Amin SP; Goldberg DJ
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2006 Jun; 8(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 16766483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low fluence-high repetition rate diode laser hair removal 12-month evaluation: reducing pain and risks while keeping clinical efficacy.
    Barolet D
    Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Apr; 44(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 22437967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effective epilation of white and blond hair using combined radiofrequency and optical energy.
    Sadick NS; Laughlin SA
    J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2004 May; 6(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 15370410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical and microscopic evaluation of long-term (6 months) epilation effects of the ipulse personal home-use intense pulsed light (IPL) device.
    Trelles MA; Ash C; Town G
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):160-8. PubMed ID: 23331874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.