BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23740704)

  • 1. [Breast cancer diagnosis - of what benefit is "second-look" ultrasound with VI-RADS 3?].
    Manych M
    Rofo; 2013 Jun; 185(6):523. PubMed ID: 23740704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound as a replacement for a hand-held second-look ultrasound for breast lesions detected initially on magnetic resonance imaging.
    Chae EY; Shin HJ; Kim HJ; Yoo H; Baek S; Cha JH; Kim HH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2246-54. PubMed ID: 24035627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of second-look ultrasound of BIRADS-3 mammary lesions detected by breast MR imaging.
    Fiaschetti V; Salimbeni C; Gaspari E; Dembele GK; Bolacchi F; Cossu E; Pistolese CA; Perretta T; Simonetti G
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3178-84. PubMed ID: 22417393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Use of BI-RADS to interpret magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer].
    Kharuzhyk SA; Shimanets SV; Karman AV; Shapoval EV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (4):46-59. PubMed ID: 25775888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: a review.
    Jalalian A; Mashohor SB; Mahmud HR; Saripan MI; Ramli AR; Karasfi B
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 23153689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combining CRF and multi-hypothesis detection for accurate lesion segmentation in breast sonograms.
    Hao Z; Wang Q; Seong YK; Lee JH; Ren H; Kim JY
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 1):504-11. PubMed ID: 23285589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast Cancer Ultrasound Images' Sequence Exploration Using BI-RADS Features' Extraction: Towards an Advanced Clinical Aided Tool for Precise Lesion Characterization.
    Sellami L; Ben Sassi O; Chtourou K; Ben Hamida A
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2015 Oct; 14(7):740-5. PubMed ID: 26513796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interobserver reliability of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) interpretation and agreement of ABVS findings with hand held breast ultrasound (HHUS), mammography and pathology results.
    Golatta M; Franz D; Harcos A; Junkermann H; Rauch G; Scharf A; Schuetz F; Sohn C; Heil J
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):e332-6. PubMed ID: 23540947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CAD algorithms for solid breast masses discrimination: evaluation of the accuracy and interobserver variability.
    Wang Y; Jiang S; Wang H; Guo YH; Liu B; Hou Y; Cheng H; Tian J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1273-81. PubMed ID: 20691917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast imaging: is the sonographic descriptor of orientation valid for magnetic resonance imaging?
    Oliveira TM; Brasileiro Sant'Anna TK; Mauad FM; Elias J; Muglia VF
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Dec; 36(6):1383-8. PubMed ID: 22911937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intensity-Invariant Texture Analysis for Classification of BI-RADS Category 3 Breast Masses.
    Lo CM; Moon WK; Huang CS; Chen JH; Yang MC; Chang RF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 41(7):2039-48. PubMed ID: 25843514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Co-registration of MR-mammography and X-ray mammography.
    Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Hopp T; Ruiter NV; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S27-9. PubMed ID: 23083591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computed-aided diagnosis (CAD) in the detection of breast cancer.
    Dromain C; Boyer B; Ferré R; Canale S; Delaloge S; Balleyguier C
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 22939365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) versus hand-held ultrasound as a second look procedure after magnetic resonance imaging.
    Girometti R; Zanotel M; Londero V; Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C
    Eur Radiol; 2017 Sep; 27(9):3767-3775. PubMed ID: 28120030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound.
    Lin X; Wang J; Han F; Fu J; Li A
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):873-8. PubMed ID: 21420814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Whole Breast Ultrasound: Comparison of the Visibility of Suspicious Lesions with Automated Breast Volumetric Scanning Versus Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound.
    Kuzmiak CM; Ko EY; Tuttle LA; Steed D; Zeng D; Yoon SC
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):870-9. PubMed ID: 25872862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast imaging. Picturing the latest breast cancer detection methods.
    Mayo Clin Womens Healthsource; 2006 May; 10(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 16585920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Utility of Real-Time MR-Navigated Ultrasound with Supine Breast MRI for Suspicious Enhancing Lesions Not Identified on Second-Look Ultrasound.
    Kang DK; Jung Y; Han S; Kim JY; Kim TH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 43(2):412-420. PubMed ID: 27780660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [On the segmentation of malignant halo in ultrasound images of breast tumor].
    Li X; Ma B; Peng Y; Liu Q
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Oct; 27(5):1020-4. PubMed ID: 21089662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chest wall segmentation in automated 3D breast ultrasound scans.
    Tan T; Platel B; Mann RM; Huisman H; Karssemeijer N
    Med Image Anal; 2013 Dec; 17(8):1273-81. PubMed ID: 23273891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.