314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23742377)
1. Predicting the effect of hearing loss and audibility on amplified speech reception in a multi-talker listening scenario.
Woods WS; Kalluri S; Pentony S; Nooraei N
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4268-78. PubMed ID: 23742377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
Scollie SD
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of informational masking on speech perception and pupil response in adults with hearing impairment.
Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1596-606. PubMed ID: 24606294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Bernstein JG; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cognitive abilities relate to self-reported hearing disability.
Zekveld AA; George EL; Houtgast T; Kramer SE
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1364-72. PubMed ID: 23838985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of companding on speech recognition in quiet and noise for listeners with ANSD.
Narne VK; Barman A; Deepthi M
Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 24237041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship between masking release in fluctuating maskers and speech reception thresholds in stationary noise.
Christiansen C; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1655-66. PubMed ID: 22978894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 in multi-talker babble: a preliminary report.
Wilson RH; Strouse A
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 11926322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Rhebergen KS; Lyzenga J; Dreschler WA; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid.
Plomp R; Duquesnoy AJ
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
Strelcyk O; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.
Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Pedersen MS; Rönnberg J
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
