These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23742789)

  • 1. Prenotification had no additional effect on the response rate and survey quality: a randomized trial.
    Xie Y; Ho SC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 66(12):1422-6. PubMed ID: 23742789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prenotification but not envelope teaser increased response rates in a bulimia nervosa mental health literacy survey: A randomized controlled trial.
    McLean SA; Paxton SJ; Massey R; Mond JM; Rodgers B; Hay PJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Aug; 67(8):870-6. PubMed ID: 24411313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. No difference demonstrated between faxed or mailed prenotification in promoting questionnaire response among family physicians: a randomized controlled trial.
    Gattellari M; Zwar N; Worthington JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):544-52. PubMed ID: 22445084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of prenotification on the response rate of a postal survey of emergency physicians: a randomised, controlled, assessor-blind trial.
    Hickey M; McIntyre L; Taljaard M; Abdulaziz K; Yadav K; Hickey C; Perry JJ
    BMJ Open; 2021 Sep; 11(9):e052843. PubMed ID: 34556517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of two mailing strategies on the response to a survey of physicians.
    Shiono PH; Klebanoff MA
    Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Sep; 134(5):539-42. PubMed ID: 1897510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of two distribution methods on response rates to a patient safety questionnaire in nursing homes.
    Lapane KL; Quilliam BJ; Hughes CM
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2007 Sep; 8(7):446-52. PubMed ID: 17845947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prenotification letter increased initial response, whereas sender did not affect response rates.
    Koopman L; Donselaar LC; Rademakers JJ; Hendriks M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 23347856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Text message reminders to improve questionnaire response rates.
    Keding A; Brabyn S; MacPherson H; Richmond SJ; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Nov; 79():90-95. PubMed ID: 27321820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shortening a survey and using alternative forms of prenotification: impact on response rate and quality.
    Beebe TJ; Rey E; Ziegenfuss JY; Jenkins S; Lackore K; Talley NJ; Locke RG
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():50. PubMed ID: 20529365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increasing response to mailed questionnaires by including a pencil/pen.
    White E; Carney PA; Kolar AS
    Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 162(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 15972931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized trial of the impact of certified mail on response rate to a physician survey, and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Del Valle ML; Morgenstern H; Rogstad TL; Albright C; Vickrey BG
    Eval Health Prof; 1997 Dec; 20(4):389-406. PubMed ID: 10183331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of a lottery for increasing physicians' responses to a mail survey.
    Baron G; De Wals P; Milord F
    Eval Health Prof; 2001 Mar; 24(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effectiveness of various mailing strategies among nonrespondents in a prospective cohort study.
    Rimm EB; Stampfer MJ; Colditz GA; Giovannucci E; Willett WC
    Am J Epidemiol; 1990 Jun; 131(6):1068-71. PubMed ID: 2343859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of personalized prenotification on response rates to an electronic survey.
    Hart AM; Brennan CW; Sym D; Larson E
    West J Nurs Res; 2009 Feb; 31(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 18515752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Three Postal Invitational Strategies to Increase Survey Response Rates in a Combat-Injured U.S. Military Population: Findings From the Wounded Warrior Recovery Project.
    Sack DI; Woodruff SI; McCabe CT; Galarneau MR; Han PP
    Mil Med; 2019 Mar; 184(Suppl 1):521-528. PubMed ID: 30901447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recruiting survey respondents to mailed surveys: controlled trials of incentives and prompts.
    Spry VM; Hovell MF; Sallis JG; Hofsteter CR; Elder JP; Molgaard CA
    Am J Epidemiol; 1989 Jul; 130(1):166-72. PubMed ID: 2741903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An advance letter did not increase the response rates in a telephone survey: a randomized trial.
    Carey RN; Reid A; Driscoll TR; Glass DC; Benke G; Fritschi L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 66(12):1417-21. PubMed ID: 23735264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of response rate and time according to the survey methods used: a randomized controlled trial.
    Yi SW; Hong JS; Ohrr H; Yi JJ
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2005; 20(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 15792278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No increase in response rate by adding a web response option to a postal population survey: a randomized trial.
    Brøgger J; Nystad W; Cappelen I; Bakke P
    J Med Internet Res; 2007 Dec; 9(5):e40. PubMed ID: 18174120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combining Internet-Based and Postal Survey Methods in a Survey among Gynecologists: Results of a Randomized Trial.
    Ernst SA; Brand T; Lhachimi SK; Zeeb H
    Health Serv Res; 2018 Apr; 53(2):879-895. PubMed ID: 28217941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.