These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23743092)

  • 21. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique.
    Neves FD; Prado CJ; Prudente MS; Carneiro TA; Zancopé K; Davi LR; Mendonça G; Cooper LF; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1134-40. PubMed ID: 24969409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Circumferential fit assessment of CAD/CAM single crowns--a pilot investigation on a new virtual analytical protocol.
    Matta RE; Schmitt J; Wichmann M; Holst S
    Quintessence Int; 2012 Oct; 43(9):801-9. PubMed ID: 23041996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns.
    Dolev E; Bitterman Y; Meirowitz A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):124-128. PubMed ID: 29961628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit.
    Zeltner M; Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 27677220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
    Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Marginal Fit Comparison of CAD/CAM Crowns Milled from Two Different Materials.
    Azarbal A; Azarbal M; Engelmeier RL; Kunkel TC
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):421-428. PubMed ID: 29143397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
    Ender A; Mehl A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of digitizing techniques on the fit of implant-retained crowns with different antirotational abutment features.
    Aktas G; Özcan N; Aydin DH; Şahin E; Akça K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 24360015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of ceramic restorations made with two CAD/CAM systems.
    Hamza TA; Ezzat HA; El-Hossary MM; Katamish HA; Shokry TE; Rosenstiel SF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 23395333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Marginal adaptation of full-coverage CAD/CAM restorations: in vitro study using a non-destructive method.
    Romeo E; Iorio M; Storelli S; Camandona M; Abati S
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Mar; 58(3):61-72. PubMed ID: 19357612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Three-dimensional analysis of marginal and internal fit of copings fabricated with polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) and zirconia.
    Bae SY; Park JY; Jeong ID; Kim HY; Kim JH; Kim WC
    J Prosthodont Res; 2017 Apr; 61(2):106-112. PubMed ID: 27484816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital evaluation of marginal and internal fit of single-crown fixed dental prostheses.
    Dahl BE; Dahl JE; Rønold HJ
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2018 Dec; 126(6):512-517. PubMed ID: 30298624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of Different CAM Strategies on the Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Digital Three-dimensional Evaluation.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(5):530-538. PubMed ID: 29630483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Full-ceramic CAD/CIM anterior crowns and copings.
    Bindl A; Windisch S; Mörmann WH
    Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Apr; 2(2):97-111. PubMed ID: 11351494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
    Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Microstructure, topography, surface roughness, fractal dimension, internal and marginal adaptation of pressed and milled lithium-disilicate monolithic restorations.
    Schestatsky R; Zucuni CP; Dapieve KS; Burgo TAL; Spazzin AO; Bacchi A; Valandro LF; Pereira GKR
    J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Jan; 64(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 31213364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CAD/CAM system influence marginal fit of different ceramic types?
    de Almeida IG; Antunes DB; Braun NX; Restani A; Straioto FG; Galhano GA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(1):127-129. PubMed ID: 30900671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Marginal and Internal Fit of Conventional Metal-Ceramic and Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns.
    Nam SJ; Yoon MJ; Kim WH; Ryu GJ; Bang MK; Huh JB
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(5):519-21. PubMed ID: 26340013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fit of pressed crowns fabricated from two CAD-CAM wax pattern process plans: A comparative in vitro study.
    Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 28024815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.