118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23743603)
1. Givenness, complexity, and the Danish dative alternation.
Kizach J; Balling LW
Mem Cognit; 2013 Nov; 41(8):1159-71. PubMed ID: 23743603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of syntactic expectations on reading comprehension is malleable and strategic: An eye-tracking study of English dative alternation.
Bridgwater E; Kyröläinen AJ; Kuperman V
Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Sep; 73(3):179-192. PubMed ID: 31081657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interaction Between Syntactic Structure and Information Structure in the Processing of a Head-Final Language.
Koizumi M; Imamura S
J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Feb; 46(1):247-260. PubMed ID: 27229871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impaired comprehension of alternating syntactic constructions in autism.
Stockbridge MD; Happé FG; White SJ
Autism Res; 2014 Jun; 7(3):314-21. PubMed ID: 24227788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity.
Warren T; Gibson E
Cognition; 2002 Aug; 85(1):79-112. PubMed ID: 12086714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Context-sensitive neural responses to conflict resolution: electrophysiological evidence from subject-object ambiguities in language comprehension.
Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel I
Brain Res; 2006 Jul; 1098(1):139-52. PubMed ID: 16765335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Surprisal and Locality on Danish Sentence Processing: An Eye-Tracking Investigation.
Balling LW; Kizach J
J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1119-1136. PubMed ID: 28332141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Animacy matters: ERP evidence for the multi-dimensionality of topic-worthiness in Chinese.
Hung YC; Schumacher PB
Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 1555():36-47. PubMed ID: 24502981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new argument for co-active parses during language comprehension.
Dillon B; Andrews C; Rotello CM; Wagers M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1271-1286. PubMed ID: 30124311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating the Processing of Relative Clauses in Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from Eye-Movement Data.
Sung YT; Cha JH; Tu JY; Wu MD; Lin WC
J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Oct; 45(5):1089-113. PubMed ID: 26385782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Context improves comprehension of fronted objects.
Kristensen LB; Engberg-Pedersen E; Poulsen M
J Psycholinguist Res; 2014 Apr; 43(2):125-40. PubMed ID: 23504556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of age, speed of processing, and working memory on comprehension of sentences with relative clauses.
Caplan D; Dede G; Waters G; Michaud J; Tripodis Y
Psychol Aging; 2011 Jun; 26(2):439-50. PubMed ID: 21480714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reading and listening in people with aphasia: effects of syntactic complexity.
DeDe G
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2013 Nov; 22(4):579-90. PubMed ID: 23813204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
Hagoort P
J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Object shape and orientation do not routinely influence performance during language processing.
Rommers J; Meyer AS; Huettig F
Psychol Sci; 2013 Nov; 24(11):2218-25. PubMed ID: 24065373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Parsing Complex Noun Phrases: Effects of Hierarchical Structure and Sentence Position on Memory Load.
Mota S; Igoa JM
Span J Psychol; 2017 Aug; 20():E37. PubMed ID: 28793940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Linguistic rhythm guides parsing decisions in written sentence comprehension.
Kentner G
Cognition; 2012 Apr; 123(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 22217385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neural responses to the production and comprehension of syntax in identical utterances.
Indefrey P; Hellwig F; Herzog H; Seitz RJ; Hagoort P
Brain Lang; 2004 May; 89(2):312-9. PubMed ID: 15068913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Information structure expectations in sentence comprehension.
Carlson K; Dickey MW; Frazier L; Clifton C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jan; 62(1):114-39. PubMed ID: 18609404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A failure to replicate rapid syntactic adaptation in comprehension.
Harrington Stack CM; James AN; Watson DG
Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):864-877. PubMed ID: 29651687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
