177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23743626)
1. Age similarities in recognizing threat from faces and diagnostic cues.
Boshyan J; Zebrowitz LA; Franklin RG; McCormick CM; Carré JM
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2014 Sep; 69(5):710-8. PubMed ID: 23743626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The facial width-to-height ratio determines interpersonal distance preferences in the observer.
Lieberz KA; Windmann S; Geniole SN; McCormick CM; Mueller-Engelmann M; Gruener F; Bornefeld-Ettmann P; Steil R
Aggress Behav; 2017 Sep; 43(5):460-470. PubMed ID: 28261811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The attractiveness halo effect and the babyface stereotype in older and younger adults: similarities, own-age accentuation, and older adult positivity effects.
Zebrowitz LA; Franklin RG
Exp Aging Res; 2014; 40(3):375-93. PubMed ID: 24785596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detecting implicit cues of aggressiveness in male faces in revictimized female PTSD patients and healthy controls.
Lieberz KA; Müller-Engelmann M; Bornefeld-Ettmann P; Priebe K; Weidmann A; Fydrich T; Geniole SN; McCormick CM; Rausch S; Thome J; Steil R
Psychiatry Res; 2018 Sep; 267():429-437. PubMed ID: 29980121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Face of a fighter: Bizygomatic width as a cue of formidability.
Zilioli S; Sell AN; Stirrat M; Jagore J; Vickerman W; Watson NV
Aggress Behav; 2015; 41(4):322-30. PubMed ID: 24910133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence from Meta-Analyses of the Facial Width-to-Height Ratio as an Evolved Cue of Threat.
Geniole SN; Denson TF; Dixson BJ; Carré JM; McCormick CM
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132726. PubMed ID: 26181579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Older and younger adults' first impressions from faces: similar in agreement but different in positivity.
Zebrowitz LA; Franklin RG; Hillman S; Boc H
Psychol Aging; 2013 Mar; 28(1):202-12. PubMed ID: 23276216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Age Differences in the Differentiation of Trait Impressions From Faces.
Ng SY; Zebrowitz LA; Franklin RG
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2016 Mar; 71(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 25194140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Body mass index, facial width-to-height ratio, and perceived formidability in female Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) fighters.
Palmer-Hague JL; Twele AC; Fuller AJ
Aggress Behav; 2018 Nov; 44(6):553-560. PubMed ID: 29956344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Age and Gender Differences in Facial Attractiveness, but Not Emotion Resemblance, Contribute to Age and Gender Stereotypes.
Palumbo R; Adams RB; Hess U; Kleck RE; Zebrowitz L
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1704. PubMed ID: 29033881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How components of facial width to height ratio differently contribute to the perception of social traits.
Costa M; Lio G; Gomez A; Sirigu A
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172739. PubMed ID: 28235081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating aggression from emotionally neutral faces: which facial cues are diagnostic?
Carré JM; Morrissey MD; Mondloch CJ; McCormick CM
Perception; 2010; 39(3):356-77. PubMed ID: 20465172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The dimensions underlying first impressions of older adult faces are similar, but not identical, for young and older adult perceivers.
Twele AC; Mondloch CJ
Br J Psychol; 2022 Nov; 113(4):1009-1032. PubMed ID: 35531976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Facing aggression: cues differ for female versus male faces.
Geniole SN; Keyes AE; Mondloch CJ; Carré JM; McCormick CM
PLoS One; 2012; 7(1):e30366. PubMed ID: 22276184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Facial width-to-height ratio predicts self-reported dominance and aggression in males and females, but a measure of masculinity does not.
Lefevre CE; Etchells PJ; Howell EC; Clark AP; Penton-Voak IS
Biol Lett; 2014 Oct; 10(10):20140729. PubMed ID: 25339656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.
Dixson BJ; Sulikowski D; Gouda-Vossos A; Rantala MJ; Brooks RC
J Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 29(11):2311-2320. PubMed ID: 27488414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age-Related Physical Changes Interfere With Judgments of Male Sexual Orientation From Faces.
Tskhay KO; Krendl AC; Rule NO
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1217-26. PubMed ID: 27340151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of type of facial stimuli.
Rennels JL; Bronstad PM; Langlois JH
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):884-93. PubMed ID: 18665733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Male facial cues to physical strength in Europe: Medium-strength preference and higher aggressiveness attribution to the weakest.
Schaefer K; Seiser VM; Prucha S; Kerschbaumer V; Fink B; Windhager S
Am J Hum Biol; 2024 Jun; 36(6):e24040. PubMed ID: 38174630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The facial width-to-height ratio shares stronger links with judgments of aggression than with judgments of trustworthiness.
Geniole SN; Molnar DS; Carré JM; McCormick CM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1526-41. PubMed ID: 24820443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
