These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23745283)

  • 1. Auditory, visual, and bimodal data link displays and how they support pilot performance.
    Steelman KS; Talleur D; Carbonari R; Yamani Y; Nunes A; McCarley JS
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2013 Jun; 84(6):560-6. PubMed ID: 23745283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional models of multitask pilot performance using advanced display technology.
    Wickens CD; Goh J; Helleberg J; Horrey WJ; Talleur DA
    Hum Factors; 2003; 45(3):360-80. PubMed ID: 14702989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of auditory signals to the operation of an agricultural vehicle: results of pilot testing.
    Karimi D; Mondor TA; Mann DD
    J Agric Saf Health; 2008 Jan; 14(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 18376536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advanced auditory displays and head-mounted displays: advantages and disadvantages for monitoring by the distracted anesthesiologist.
    Sanderson PM; Watson MO; Russell WJ; Jenkins S; Liu D; Green N; Llewelyn K; Cole P; Shek V; Krupenia SS
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Jun; 106(6):1787-97. PubMed ID: 18499611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Enhanced detection with bimodal sonar displays.
    Doll TJ; Hanna TE
    Hum Factors; 1989 Oct; 31(5):539-50. PubMed ID: 2625348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of in-vehicle warning information displays with or without spatial compatibility on driving behaviors and response performance.
    Liu YC; Jhuang JW
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 22103964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tactile cueing effects on performance in simulated aerial combat with high acceleration.
    van Erp JB; Eriksson L; Levin B; Carlander O; Veltman JA; Vos WK
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 Dec; 78(12):1128-34. PubMed ID: 18064917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reference frame congruency in search-and-rescue tasks.
    Pavlovic NJ; Keillor J; Hollands JG; Chignell MH
    Hum Factors; 2009 Apr; 51(2):240-50. PubMed ID: 19653486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating pilot performance using mixed-modality simulated data link.
    Lancaster JA; Casali JG
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):183-93. PubMed ID: 18516831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of localized auditory information on visual target detection performance using a helmet-mounted display.
    Nelson WT; Hettinger LJ; Cunningham JA; Brickman BJ; Haas MW; McKinley RL
    Hum Factors; 1998 Sep; 40(3):452-60. PubMed ID: 9849103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A user study of auditory, head-up and multi-modal displays in vehicles.
    Jakus G; Dicke C; Sodnik J
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Jan; 46 Pt A():184-92. PubMed ID: 25151313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multidimensional measure of display clutter and pilot performance for advanced head-up display.
    Kim SH; Prinzel LJ; Kaber DB; Alexander AL; Stelzer EM; Kaufmann K; Veil T
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2011 Nov; 82(11):1013-22. PubMed ID: 22097635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of visual, auditory, and cutaneous tracking displays when divided attention is required to a cross-adaptive loading task.
    Schori TR
    Ergonomics; 1973 Mar; 16(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 4726649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An integrated measure of display clutter based on feature content, user knowledge and attention allocation factors.
    Pankok C; Kaber DB
    Ergonomics; 2018 May; 61(5):682-696. PubMed ID: 29099336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Head-up displays: effects of clutter, display intensity, and display location on pilot performance.
    Ververs PM; Wickens CD
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1998; 8(4):377-403. PubMed ID: 11542276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tracking performance with visual, auditory, or electrocutaneous displays.
    Hofmann MA; Heimstra NW
    Hum Factors; 1972 Apr; 14(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 5022472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monitoring with head-mounted displays: performance and safety in a full-scale simulator and part-task trainer.
    Liu D; Jenkins SA; Sanderson PM; Watson MO; Leane T; Kruys A; Russell WJ
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Oct; 109(4):1135-46. PubMed ID: 19762741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory, tactile, and multisensory cues facilitate search for dynamic visual stimuli.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1654-65. PubMed ID: 20675808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Applicability of location compatibility to the arrangement of display and control in human - vehicle systems: comparison between young and older adults.
    Murata A; Moriwaka M
    Ergonomics; 2007 Jan; 50(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 17178654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multisensory teamwork: using a tactile or an auditory display to exchange gaze information improves performance in joint visual search.
    Wahn B; Schwandt J; Krüger M; Crafa D; Nunnendorf V; König P
    Ergonomics; 2016 Jun; 59(6):781-95. PubMed ID: 26587687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.