194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23745302)
1. Endometrial carcinoma: clinical characteristic and survival rates by the new compared to the prior FIGO staging systems.
Tangjitgamol S; Srijaipracharoen S; Manusirivithaya S; Khunnarong J; Pataradool K; Thavaramara T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 May; 96(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 23745302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary: review of 43 cases].
Ma SK; Zhang HT; Sun YC; Wu LY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2008 Sep; 30(9):690-4. PubMed ID: 19173912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The outcome of stage I-II clinically and surgically staged papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancers when compared with endometrioid carcinoma.
Cirisano FD; Robboy SJ; Dodge RK; Bentley RC; Krigman HR; Synan IS; Soper JT; Clarke-Pearson DL
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Apr; 77(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 10739691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An intensive follow-up does not change survival of patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer.
Gadducci A; Cosio S; Fanucchi A; Cristofani R; Genazzani AR
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10928137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Impact of 2009 FIGO staging system on the diagnostic value of preoperative MRI staging of endometrial carcinoma].
Yu XD; Ouyang H; Lin M; Zhou CW; Zhang R
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 33(9):692-6. PubMed ID: 22340052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Combined treatment and prognostic factors for stage III and IV endometrial carcinoma].
Ren YL; Wang HY; Shi DR; Yang WT; Sun Z; Chen Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 43(7):523-7. PubMed ID: 19080517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stage II endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: clinical implications of cervical stromal invasion.
Orezzoli JP; Sioletic S; Olawaiye A; Oliva E; del Carmen MG
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 19345400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The prognostic significance of age in surgically staged patients with Type II endometrial carcinoma.
Vance S; Yechieli R; Cogan C; Hanna R; Munkarah A; Elshaikh MA
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jul; 126(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 22507535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer lead to increased discrimination in patient outcomes?
Cooke EW; Pappas L; Gaffney DK
Cancer; 2011 Sep; 117(18):4231-7. PubMed ID: 21387282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The significance of the amount of myometrial invasion in patients with Stage IB endometrial carcinoma.
Alektiar KM; McKee A; Lin O; Venkatraman E; Zelefsky MJ; Mychalczak BR; McKee B; Hoskins WJ; Barakat RR
Cancer; 2002 Jul; 95(2):316-21. PubMed ID: 12124832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New revised FIGO 2008 staging system for endometrial cancer produces better discrimination in survival compared with the 1988 staging system.
Kato T; Watari H; Endo D; Mitamura T; Odagiri T; Konno Y; Hosaka M; Kobayashi N; Todo Y; Sudo S; Takeda M; Dong P; Kaneuchi M; Kudo M; Sakuragi N
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Dec; 106(8):938-41. PubMed ID: 22740340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of prognosis in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer staged IB in FIGO 1988 and 2009 classifications.
Gottwald L; Moszynska-Zielińska M; Spych M; Korczynski J; Tylinski W; Szwalski J; Kubiak R; Pasz-Walczak G; Sobotkowski J; Suzin J; Piekarski J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Oct; 286(4):995-1000. PubMed ID: 22627994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revision of FIGO surgical staging in 2009 for endometrial cancer validates to improve risk stratification.
Werner HM; Trovik J; Marcickiewicz J; Tingulstad S; Staff AC; Amant F; Salvesen HB;
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 125(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 22100838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lymphadenectomy increases the prognostic value of the revised 2009 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: a multi-center study.
Kim HS; Kim HY; Park CY; Lee JM; Lee JK; Cho CH; Kim SM; Kim JW
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 38(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 22244682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lymph-vascular space invasion and number of positive para-aortic node groups predict survival in node-positive patients with endometrial cancer.
Watari H; Todo Y; Takeda M; Ebina Y; Yamamoto R; Sakuragi N
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 15721407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. FIGO stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma: prognostic factors and outcomes.
Hoekstra AV; Kim RJ; Small W; Rademaker AW; Helenowski IB; Singh DK; Schink JC; Lurain JR
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 19428094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Endometrial cancer. Clinico-surgical classification and treatment results (analysis of 134 patients)].
Torres Lobatón A; Flores Villa J; Román Bassaure E; Rojo Herrera G; Barra García R; Hernández Aten D
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1998 Sep; 66():381-8. PubMed ID: 9789412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surgical stage, final grade, and survival of women with endometrial carcinoma whose preoperative endometrial biopsy shows well-differentiated tumors.
Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki J; Mount SL
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Nov; 99(2):309-12. PubMed ID: 16005945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of body mass index on clinicopathologic features, surgical morbidity and outcome in patients with endometrial cancer.
Akbayır O; Corbacıoglu Esmer A; Numanoglu C; Cılesız Goksedef BP; Akca A; Bakır LV; Kuru O
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Nov; 286(5):1269-76. PubMed ID: 22729137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
