BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23745979)

  • 1. Characteristics of Down syndrome subjects in a Saudi sample.
    Korayem MA; AlKofide EA
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 23745979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
    Takriti M; Dashash M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cranial base, maxillary and mandibular morphology in Down syndrome.
    Suri S; Tompson BD; Cornfoot L
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):861-9. PubMed ID: 20578856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparisons of soft tissue chin thickness in adult patients with various mandibular divergence patterns.
    Macari AT; Hanna AE
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):708-14. PubMed ID: 24188123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis.
    Celik E; Polat-Ozsoy O; Toygar Memikoglu TU
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 19237509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cephalometric analysis of pharyngeal airway space dimensions in Turner syndrome.
    Eklund M; Kotilainen J; Evälahti M; Waltimo-Sirén J
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 22275513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of primary correction of nasal septal deformity in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate on the craniofacial morphology.
    Janiszewska-Olszowska J; Gawrych E; Wędrychowska-Szulc B; Stepien P; Konury J; Wilk G
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 41(6):468-72. PubMed ID: 23273648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of skeletal changes between female adolescents and adults with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion after orthodontic treatment.
    Ding Y; Zhao JH; Deng JR; Wang XJ
    Chin J Dent Res; 2012; 15(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 23509835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.
    Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Components of anterior crossbite in the primary dentition.
    Tsai HH
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2001; 68(1):27-32, 10. PubMed ID: 11324403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic model of anterior open bite--a new way to predict skeletal type: a cross-sectional study.
    Urzal V; Braga AC; Ferreira AP
    Int Orthod; 2014 Sep; 12(3):358-70. PubMed ID: 25087172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determinants of successful treatment of bimaxillary protrusion: orthodontic treatment versus anterior segmental osteotomy.
    Baek SH; Kim BH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 16(2):234-46. PubMed ID: 15750420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].
    Wang XJ; Zhang YM; Zhou YH
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 30773550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A three-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
    Cho HJ
    J Clin Orthod; 2009 Apr; 43(4):235-52, discussion 235; quiz 273. PubMed ID: 19458456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Glenoid fossa position in Class II malocclusion associated with mandibular retrusion.
    Giuntini V; De Toffol L; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):808-12. PubMed ID: 18298205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Craniofacial cephalometric morphology in 8-year-old children with operated sagittal synostosis.
    Heliövaara A; Vuola P; Hukki J
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 Feb; 18(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 25264570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in cephalometric measurements: a comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods.
    Polat-Ozsoy O; Gokcelik A; Toygar Memikoglu TU
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 19349417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in skeletal Class II diagnosis using various cephalometric analyses.
    Contardo L; Ceschi M; Castaldo A; Denotti G; Di Lenarda R
    J Clin Orthod; 2008 Jul; 42(7):389-92. PubMed ID: 18794575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Craniofacial morphology in pediatric patients with persistent obstructive sleep apnea with or without positive airway pressure therapy: a cross-sectional cephalometric comparison with controls.
    Korayem MM; Witmans M; MacLean J; Heo G; El-Hakim H; Flores-Mir C; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 23810049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.