These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23745979)

  • 21. Nevoid Basal cell carcinoma syndrome: a cephalometric study of patients and controls.
    Leonardi R; Licciardello V; Santarelli A; Ciavarella D; Bolouri S; Härle F; Caltabiano M; Lo Muzio L
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 20(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 19165028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Glenoid fossa position in surgically repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate patients.
    Sundareswaran S; Nipun CA
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Aug; 37(4):386-90. PubMed ID: 25351572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reliability and the smallest detectable differences of lateral cephalometric measurements.
    Damstra J; Huddleston Slater JJ; Fourie Z; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):546.e1-8; discussion 546-7. PubMed ID: 21055590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cranial-base morphology in adults with skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Sanggarnjanavanich S; Sekiya T; Nomura Y; Nakayama T; Hanada N; Nakamura Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 24975002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cephalometric evaluation of patients with anterior open-bite.
    Stuani AS; Matsumoto MA; Stuani MB
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 11210273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application.
    Anwar N; Fida M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):516-22. PubMed ID: 19679646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of cephalometric, hormonal and enzymatic parameters in young obese subjects.
    Giuca MR; Giannotti L; Saggese R; Vanni A; Pasini M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 24294999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relationship between vertical facial patterns and dental arch form in class II malocclusion.
    Grippaudo C; Oliva B; Greco AL; Sferra S; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Nov; 14():43. PubMed ID: 24326093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Craniofacial morphological differences between Down syndrome and maxillary deficiency children.
    Silva Jesuino FA; Valladares-Neto J
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Feb; 35(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 21911842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Craniofacial profile in Southern Chinese with hypodontia.
    Chan DW; Samman N; McMillan AS
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19193707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Craniofacial adaptations induced by chincup therapy in Class III patients.
    Deguchi T; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Feb; 115(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 9971929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The mandibular response in Class II malocclusions correction.
    Cordua T; Deli R; Giuliante L; Ursini R
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(3):31-9. PubMed ID: 22031992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dentoalveolar compensation according to skeletal discrepancy and overjet in skeletal Class III patients.
    Kim SJ; Kim KH; Yu HS; Baik HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 24582023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of retraction of anterior teeth and initial soft tissue variables on lip changes in Japanese adults.
    Hayashida H; Ioi H; Nakata S; Takahashi I; Counts AL
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 20966067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of hand-traced and computer-based cephalometric superimpositions.
    Huja SS; Grubaugh EL; Rummel AM; Fields HW; Beck FM
    Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):428-35. PubMed ID: 19413396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Post-treatment evaluation of a magnetic activator device in Class II high-angle malocclusions.
    Yüksel S; Kaygisiz E; Ulusoy C; Keykubat A
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 20053717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Craniofacial morphology characteristics of operated unilateral complete cleft lip and palate patients in mixed dentition.
    Liu R; Lu D; Wamalwa P; Li C; Hu H; Zou S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21831675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Craniofacial morphology and inclination of the posterior slope of the articular eminence in female patients with and without condylar bone change.
    Estomaguio GA; Yamada K; Ochi K; Hayashi T; Hanada K
    Cranio; 2005 Oct; 23(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 16353465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cranial base features in skeletal Class III patients.
    Proff P; Will F; Bokan I; Fanghänel J; Gedrange T
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 18416608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does hyoid bone resection according to Sistrunk influence normal craniofacial growth? A cephalometric study.
    Joss-Vassalli IM; Joss CU; Gebauer U
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2275-82. PubMed ID: 19761923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.