These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23746162)

  • 1. Evaluating the quality of medical multiple-choice items created with automated processes.
    Gierl MJ; Lai H
    Med Educ; 2013 Jul; 47(7):726-33. PubMed ID: 23746162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using automatic item generation to create multiple-choice test items.
    Gierl MJ; Lai H; Turner SR
    Med Educ; 2012 Aug; 46(8):757-65. PubMed ID: 22803753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using Automatic Item Generation to Improve the Quality of MCQ Distractors.
    Lai H; Gierl MJ; Touchie C; Pugh D; Boulais AP; De Champlain A
    Teach Learn Med; 2016; 28(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 26849247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three Modeling Applications to Promote Automatic Item Generation for Examinations in Dentistry.
    Lai H; Gierl MJ; Byrne BE; Spielman AI; Waldschmidt DM
    J Dent Educ; 2016 Mar; 80(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 26933110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using cognitive models to develop quality multiple-choice questions.
    Pugh D; De Champlain A; Gierl M; Lai H; Touchie C
    Med Teach; 2016 Aug; 38(8):838-43. PubMed ID: 26998566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automated Test-Item Generation System for Retrieval Practice in Radiology Education.
    Gunabushanam G; Taylor CR; Mathur M; Bokhari J; Scoutt LM
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):851-859. PubMed ID: 30316703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility assurance: a review of automatic item generation in medical assessment.
    Falcão F; Costa P; Pêgo JM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2022 May; 27(2):405-425. PubMed ID: 35230589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A suggestive approach for assessing item quality, usability and validity of Automatic Item Generation.
    Falcão F; Pereira DM; Gonçalves N; De Champlain A; Costa P; Pêgo JM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2023 Dec; 28(5):1441-1465. PubMed ID: 37097483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved student learning in ophthalmology with computer-aided instruction.
    Devitt P; Smith JR; Palmer E
    Eye (Lond); 2001 Oct; 15(Pt 5):635-9. PubMed ID: 11702976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality assurance of item writing: during the introduction of multiple choice questions in medicine for high stakes examinations.
    Ware J; Vik T
    Med Teach; 2009 Mar; 31(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 18825568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the quality of clinical teaching: a preliminary study.
    Conigliaro RL; Stratton TD
    Med Educ; 2010 Apr; 44(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 20444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-aided learning in the real world of medical education: does the quality of interaction with the computer affect student learning?
    Hudson JN
    Med Educ; 2004 Aug; 38(8):887-95. PubMed ID: 15271050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.
    Downing SM
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and evaluation of an e-learning package for teaching skin examination. Action research.
    Farrimond H; Dornan TL; Cockcroft A; Rhodes LE
    Br J Dermatol; 2006 Sep; 155(3):592-9. PubMed ID: 16911287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Crowdsourcing for assessment items to support adaptive learning.
    Tackett S; Raymond M; Desai R; Haist SA; Morales A; Gaglani S; Clyman SG
    Med Teach; 2018 Aug; 40(8):838-841. PubMed ID: 30096987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-fidelity patient simulation: validation of performance checklists.
    Morgan PJ; Cleave-Hogg D; DeSousa S; Tarshis J
    Br J Anaesth; 2004 Mar; 92(3):388-92. PubMed ID: 14742327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Student perspectives of assessment by TEMM model in physiology.
    Abraham RR; Upadhya S; Torke S; Ramnarayan K
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2005 Jun; 29(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 15905152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using item response theory to explore the psychometric properties of extended matching questions examination in undergraduate medical education.
    Bhakta B; Tennant A; Horton M; Lawton G; Andrich D
    BMC Med Educ; 2005 Mar; 5(1):9. PubMed ID: 15752421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of an interactive case simulation system in dermatology and venereology for medical students.
    Wahlgren CF; Edelbring S; Fors U; Hindbeck H; Ståhle M
    BMC Med Educ; 2006 Aug; 6():40. PubMed ID: 16907972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple choice questions in Sudan medical schools.
    Elfaki EA
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Dec; 21(12):1197. PubMed ID: 11360103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.