BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23747152)

  • 1. Multivariate normally distributed biomarkers subject to limits of detection and receiver operating characteristic curve inference.
    Perkins NJ; Schisterman EF; Vexler A
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Jul; 20(7):838-46. PubMed ID: 23747152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ROC curve inference for best linear combination of two biomarkers subject to limits of detection.
    Perkins NJ; Schisterman EF; Vexler A
    Biom J; 2011 May; 53(3):464-76. PubMed ID: 22223252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Receiver operating characteristic curve inference from a sample with a limit of detection.
    Perkins NJ; Schisterman EF; Vexler A
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 165(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 17110640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Youden Index and optimal cut-point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of detection.
    Ruopp MD; Perkins NJ; Whitcomb BW; Schisterman EF
    Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):419-30. PubMed ID: 18435502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A semiparametric method for comparing the discriminatory ability of biomarkers subject to limit of detection.
    Yin L; Diao G; Liu A
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4141-4152. PubMed ID: 28744876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semiparametric transformation models for multiple continuous biomarkers in ROC analysis.
    Kim E; Zeng D; Zhou XH
    Biom J; 2015 Sep; 57(5):808-33. PubMed ID: 26138227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive inference for best linear combination of biomarkers subject to limits of detection.
    Coolen-Maturi T
    Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(18):2844-2874. PubMed ID: 28556298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generalized ROC curve inference for a biomarker subject to a limit of detection and measurement error.
    Perkins NJ; Schisterman EF; Vexler A
    Stat Med; 2009 Jun; 28(13):1841-60. PubMed ID: 19340817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adjustment for measurement error in evaluating diagnostic biomarkers by using an internal reliability sample.
    White MT; Xie SX
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(27):4709-25. PubMed ID: 23765915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combining biomarkers for classification with covariate adjustment.
    Kim S; Huang Y
    Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(15):2347-2362. PubMed ID: 28276080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bootstrap-based testing approaches for the assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers subject to a limit of detection.
    Franco-Pereira AM; Nakas CT; Leichtle AB; Pardo MC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 May; 28(5):1564-1578. PubMed ID: 29635975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interval estimation for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve when data are subject to error.
    Li Y; Koval JJ; Donner A; Zou GY
    Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2521-31. PubMed ID: 20684006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian modeling and inference for diagnostic accuracy and probability of disease based on multiple diagnostic biomarkers with and without a perfect reference standard.
    Jafarzadeh SR; Johnson WO; Gardner IA
    Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(6):859-76. PubMed ID: 26415924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A family of estimators to diagnostic accuracy when candidate tests are subject to detection limits-Application to diagnosing early stage Alzheimer disease.
    Xiong C; Luo J; Agboola F; Grant E; Morris JC
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 May; 31(5):882-898. PubMed ID: 35044258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maximum likelihood ratio tests for comparing the discriminatory ability of biomarkers subject to limit of detection.
    Vexler A; Liu A; Eliseeva E; Schisterman EF
    Biometrics; 2008 Sep; 64(3):895-903. PubMed ID: 18047527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Statistical inference for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of random measurement error.
    Schisterman EF; Faraggi D; Reiser B; Trevisan M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2001 Jul; 154(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 11447052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical inference for the two-sample problem under likelihood ratio ordering, with application to the ROC curve estimation.
    Hu D; Yuan M; Yu T; Li P
    Stat Med; 2023 Sep; 42(20):3649-3664. PubMed ID: 37311560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Smoothed empirical likelihood inference for ROC curve in the presence of missing biomarker values.
    Cheng W; Tang N
    Biom J; 2020 Jul; 62(4):1038-1059. PubMed ID: 31957095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian estimation of the receiver operating characteristic curve for a diagnostic test with a limit of detection in the absence of a gold standard.
    Jafarzadeh SR; Johnson WO; Utts JM; Gardner IA
    Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2090-106. PubMed ID: 20603894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.