These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23747195)
1. Long-term kinematic analysis of cervical spine after single-level implantation of Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: a review. Resnick DK Spine J; 2013 Jun; 13(6):635-6. PubMed ID: 23747195 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term kinematic analysis of cervical spine after single-level implantation of Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Ryu WH; Kowalczyk I; Duggal N Spine J; 2013 Jun; 13(6):628-34. PubMed ID: 23578991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Application of Cervical Arthroplasty With Bryan Cervical Disc: 10-Year Follow-up Results in China. Zhao Y; Zhang Y; Sun Y; Pan S; Zhou F; Liu Z Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 26751058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. X-Ray-based Kinematic Analysis of Cervical Spine According to Prosthesis Designs: Analysis of the Mobi C, Bryan, PCM, and Prestige LP. Park SB; Kim KJ; Jin YJ; Kim HJ; Jahng TA; Chung CK J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Jun; 28(5):E291-7. PubMed ID: 23429318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of medium-long-term therapeutic effect of PCM artificial cervical disc replacement. Li H; Weng Y; Zhou D; Nong L; Xu N Panminerva Med; 2017 Dec; 59(4):342-344. PubMed ID: 28752986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical and radiological outcome at 10 years of follow-up after total cervical disc replacement. Mehren C; Heider F; Siepe CJ; Zillner B; Kothe R; Korge A; Mayer HM Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2441-2449. PubMed ID: 28676980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bone loss of the superior adjacent vertebral body immediately posterior to the anterior flange of Bryan cervical disc. Kim SH; Chung YS; Ropper AE; Min KH; Ahn TK; Won KS; Shin DA; Han IB Eur Spine J; 2015 Dec; 24(12):2872-9. PubMed ID: 25787945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Bryan versus ProDisc-C total disk replacement as treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disk disease. Zhang Z; Jiao L; Zhu W; Du Y; Zhang W Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2015 Mar; 135(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 25555380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical and radiographic results after treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease with the bryan disc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year follow-up. Wang Q; Cheng H; Mao Z; Qi X; Zhang M; Chen Y Acta Orthop Belg; 2011 Dec; 77(6):809-15. PubMed ID: 22308628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Adjacent segment degeneration after cervical artificial disc replacement at early mid-term follow-up]. Yapu L; Xia H; Ai F; Shi L; Sui W Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Apr; 26(4):385-9. PubMed ID: 22568313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Four-year results of a prospective single-arm study on 200 semi-constrained total cervical disc prostheses: clinical and radiographic outcome. Meisel HJ; Jurák L; Antinheimo J; Arregui R; Bruchmann B; Čabraja M; Caroli F; Kroppenstedt S; Kryl J; Pohjola J; Shackleford I; Sola S; Stosberg P; Stulik J; Woiciechowsky C; Suchomel P J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):556-565. PubMed ID: 27258476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical kinematics and radiological changes after Discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion. Hou Y; Liu Y; Yuan W; Wang X; Chen H; Yang L; Zhang Y Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):867-77. PubMed ID: 24076441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty. Sasso RC; Best NM J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adjacent segment pathology following cervical motion-sparing procedures or devices compared with fusion surgery: a systematic review. Harrod CC; Hilibrand AS; Fischer DJ; Skelly AC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S96-S112. PubMed ID: 22872222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sagittal alignment after Bryan cervical arthroplasty. Sasso RC; Metcalf NH; Hipp JA; Wharton ND; Anderson PA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):991-6. PubMed ID: 21358477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article. Burkus JK; Traynelis VC; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):516-28. PubMed ID: 25036218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Postoperative segmental malalignment after surgery with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: is it related to the mechanics and design of the prosthesis? Walraevens JR; Liu B; Sloten JV; Demaerel P; Goffin J J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):372-6. PubMed ID: 20124918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results. Davis RJ; Nunley PD; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Jackson RJ; Bae HW; Hoffman GA; Gaede SE; Danielson GO; Gordon C; Stone MB J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 25380538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]