These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2374744)

  • 1. Effect of retention grooves on fracture strength of Class 2 composite resin and amalgam restorations.
    Caplan DJ; Denehy GE; Reinhardt JW
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):48-52. PubMed ID: 2374744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture resistance of Class II approximal slot restorations.
    Yaman SD; Yetmez M; Türköz E; Akkas N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep; 84(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 11005902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture strength of Class I versus Class II restored premolars tested at the marginal ridge. I. Standard preparations.
    Purk JH; Eick JD; DeSchepper EJ; Chappell RP; Tira DE
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Jul; 21(7):545-51. PubMed ID: 2094853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of retention grooves on posterior composite resin restorations: an in vitro microleakage study.
    Shahani DR; Menezes JM
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(4):156-64. PubMed ID: 1287597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture strength of Class I versus Class II restored premolars tested at the marginal ridge. 2. Cavosurface bonding and cavosurface plus internal enamel bonding.
    Purk JH; Eick JD; Roberts M; Chappell RP; Moore DL
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Aug; 21(8):655-62. PubMed ID: 2094870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations.
    Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 12744406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of grooves on resistance/retention form of Class 2 approximal slot amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Osborne JW; Burgess JO
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(5):209-13. PubMed ID: 8152991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increases in cavity volume associated with the removal of class 2 amalgam and composite restorations.
    Hunter AR; Treasure ET; Hunter AJ
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 8700763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Esthetic veneering of amalgam restorations with composite resin--combining the best of both worlds?
    Plasmans PJ; Reukers EA
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 8337184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of grooves on resistance form of Class 2 amalgams with wide occlusal preparations.
    Summitt JB; Osborne JW; Burgess JO; Howell ML
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 8337180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture strength of restored premolars.
    Camacho GB; Gonçalves M; Nonaka T; Osório AB
    Am J Dent; 2007 Apr; 20(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 17542207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The strength of Class II composite resin restorations as affected by preparation design.
    Summitt JB; Della Bona A; Burgess JO
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Apr; 25(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 8058898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The amalgam-free dental school.
    Roeters FJ; Opdam NJ; Loomans BA
    J Dent; 2004 Jul; 32(5):371-7. PubMed ID: 15193785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of cervical grooves on the contraction gap in class 2 composites.
    Coli P; Blixt M; Brännström M
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 8332539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of cavity preparation and lamination on bond strength and fracture of tooth-colored restorations in primary molars.
    Suwatviroj P; Messer LB; Palamara JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 14733466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of pre- and postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of amalgam and composite restorations.
    Ulukapi H; Benderli Y; Ulukapi I
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):505-8. PubMed ID: 12946068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retention of Class 3 composite restorations: retention grooves versus enamel bonding.
    Summitt JB; Chan DC; Dutton FB
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):88-93. PubMed ID: 8415168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.