310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23748178)
1. Robot versus laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a comparison of the intraoperative and perioperative results of a single surgeon's initial experience.
Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1145-9. PubMed ID: 23748178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robot-assisted total preservation of the pelvic autonomic nerve with extended systematic lymphadenectomy as part of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Lee YS; Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1133-8. PubMed ID: 23792607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.
Nie JC; Yan AQ; Liu XS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Nov; 27(9):1990-1999. PubMed ID: 28858908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study.
Kim TH; Choi CH; Choi JK; Yoon A; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1466-73. PubMed ID: 25207462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Long-Term Oncological Outcomes Between the Initial Learning Period of Robotic and the Experienced Period of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Chong GO; Lee YH; Lee HJ; Hong DG; Lee YS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Feb; 28(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 29303929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer.
Nezhat FR; Datta MS; Liu C; Chuang L; Zakashansky K
JSLS; 2008; 12(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 18765043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study.
Hao M; Wang Z; Wei F; Wang J; Wang W; Ping Y
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):594-9. PubMed ID: 26807637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience.
Mendivil AA; Rettenmaier MA; Abaid LN; Brown JV; Micha JP; Lopez KL; Goldstein BH
Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26409687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ["Learning curve" robotic radical hysterectomy compared to standardized laparoscopy assisted radical vaginal and open radical hysterectomy].
Pilka R; Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Neubert D
Ceska Gynekol; 2013 Jan; 78(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 23607379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A case-control study of robotic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using 3 robotic arms compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer.
Nam EJ; Kim SW; Kim S; Kim JH; Jung YW; Paek JH; Lee SH; Kim JW; Kim YT
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1284-9. PubMed ID: 21289494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
Obermair A; Gebski V; Frumovitz M; Soliman PT; Schmeler KM; Levenback C; Ramirez PT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):584-8. PubMed ID: 18722970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis of genitourinary function after type C1 robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus type C2 robotic radical hysterectomy.
Paek J; Kang E; Lim PC
Surg Oncol; 2019 Sep; 30():58-62. PubMed ID: 31500786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Laparoscopic anatomical nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a clinical analysis of 37 cases].
Chen Y; Li Y; Xu HC; Li JN; Li YY; Liang ZQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 44(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 19573312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer.
Sert BM; Boggess JF; Ahmad S; Jackson AL; Stavitzski NM; Dahl AA; Holloway RW
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 42(4):513-22. PubMed ID: 26843445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Laparoscopic type C1 hysterectomy based on the anatomic landmark of the uterus deep vein and its branches for cervical cancer].
Liang MR; Han DX; Jiang W; Liu H; Li L; Zhong ML; Luo L; Zeng SY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 40(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 29730917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
