These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23748178)

  • 1. Robot versus laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a comparison of the intraoperative and perioperative results of a single surgeon's initial experience.
    Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS; Lee YS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1145-9. PubMed ID: 23748178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robotics versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a multicenter study.
    Tinelli R; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Perone C; Fusco A; Cicinelli E; Nezhat F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Sep; 18(9):2622-8. PubMed ID: 21394663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robot-assisted total preservation of the pelvic autonomic nerve with extended systematic lymphadenectomy as part of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Lee YS; Chong GO; Lee YH; Hong DG; Cho YL; Park IS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1133-8. PubMed ID: 23792607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
    Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy Results in Better Surgical Outcomes Compared With the Traditional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer.
    Nie JC; Yan AQ; Liu XS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Nov; 27(9):1990-1999. PubMed ID: 28858908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients: a matched-case comparative study.
    Kim TH; Choi CH; Choi JK; Yoon A; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Bae DS; Kim BG
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1466-73. PubMed ID: 25207462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a case control study.
    Vizza E; Corrado G; Mancini E; Vici P; Sergi D; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Pomati G; Cutillo G
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 24063966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
    Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
    Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Long-Term Oncological Outcomes Between the Initial Learning Period of Robotic and the Experienced Period of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
    Chong GO; Lee YH; Lee HJ; Hong DG; Lee YS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Feb; 28(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 29303929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer.
    Nezhat FR; Datta MS; Liu C; Chuang L; Zakashansky K
    JSLS; 2008; 12(3):227-37. PubMed ID: 18765043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study.
    Hao M; Wang Z; Wei F; Wang J; Wang W; Ping Y
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):594-9. PubMed ID: 26807637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survival rate comparisons amongst cervical cancer patients treated with an open, robotic-assisted or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: A five year experience.
    Mendivil AA; Rettenmaier MA; Abaid LN; Brown JV; Micha JP; Lopez KL; Goldstein BH
    Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 25(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 26409687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ["Learning curve" robotic radical hysterectomy compared to standardized laparoscopy assisted radical vaginal and open radical hysterectomy].
    Pilka R; Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Neubert D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2013 Jan; 78(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 23607379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A case-control study of robotic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using 3 robotic arms compared with abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer.
    Nam EJ; Kim SW; Kim S; Kim JH; Jung YW; Paek JH; Lee SH; Kim JW; Kim YT
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1284-9. PubMed ID: 21289494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
    Obermair A; Gebski V; Frumovitz M; Soliman PT; Schmeler KM; Levenback C; Ramirez PT
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):584-8. PubMed ID: 18722970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative analysis of genitourinary function after type C1 robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus type C2 robotic radical hysterectomy.
    Paek J; Kang E; Lim PC
    Surg Oncol; 2019 Sep; 30():58-62. PubMed ID: 31500786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Laparoscopic anatomical nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a clinical analysis of 37 cases].
    Chen Y; Li Y; Xu HC; Li JN; Li YY; Liang ZQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 44(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 19573312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer.
    Sert BM; Boggess JF; Ahmad S; Jackson AL; Stavitzski NM; Dahl AA; Holloway RW
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Apr; 42(4):513-22. PubMed ID: 26843445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Laparoscopic type C1 hysterectomy based on the anatomic landmark of the uterus deep vein and its branches for cervical cancer].
    Liang MR; Han DX; Jiang W; Liu H; Li L; Zhong ML; Luo L; Zeng SY
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 40(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 29730917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.