These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23748613)

  • 1. Reliability and reproducibility of classifications for distal radius fractures.
    Küçük L; Kumbaracı M; Günay H; Karapınar L; Ozdemir O
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2013; 47(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 23748613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are distal radius fracture classifications reproducible? Intra and interobserver agreement.
    Belloti JC; Tamaoki MJ; Franciozi CE; Santos JB; Balbachevsky D; Chap Chap E; Albertoni WM; Faloppa F
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2008 May; 126(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 18711658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Poor interobserver reliability of AO classification of fractures of the distal radius. Additional computed tomography is of minor value.
    Flikkilä T; Nikkola-Sihto A; Kaarela O; Pääkkö E; Raatikainen T
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1998 Jul; 80(4):670-2. PubMed ID: 9699835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Older's classification of Colles' fractures. Good intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in 185 cases.
    Andersen GR; Rasmussen JB; Dahl B; Solgaard S
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1991 Oct; 62(5):463-4. PubMed ID: 1950492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The comparative study of reliability and reproducibility of distal radius' fracture classification among: AO frykman and Fernandez classification systems.
    Siripakarn Y; Niempoog S; Boontanapibul K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Jan; 96(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 23720978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classification of distal radius fractures: an analysis of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.
    Andersen DJ; Blair WF; Steyers CM; Adams BD; el-Khouri GY; Brandser EA
    J Hand Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 21(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 8842946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of simplified Frykman and AO classifications of fractures of the distal radius. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver agreement.
    Illarramendi A; González Della Valle A; Segal E; De Carli P; Maignon G; Gallucci G
    Int Orthop; 1998; 22(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 9651777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distal radius fractures: Classifications concordance among orthopedic residents on a teaching hospital.
    Peña-Martínez VM; Villanueva-Guerra E; Tamez-Mata Y; Simental-Mendía M; Gallardo-Madrid A; Blázquez-Saldaña J; Acosta-Olivo C
    J Orthop Sci; 2024 Jan; 29(1):133-137. PubMed ID: 36460558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A retrospective evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of Arbeitsgemeinschaftfür Osteosynthesefragen classification and Fernandez classification for distal radius fracture.
    Yinjie Y; Gen W; Hongbo W; Chongqing X; Fan Z; Yanqi F; Xuequn W; Wen M
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jan; 99(2):e18508. PubMed ID: 31914022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interobserver Agreement and Intraobserver Reproducibility of Barzullah Working Classification of Distal End Radius Fractures among Orthopaedic Residents.
    Kamal Y; Khan HA; Gani NU; Farooq M; Shah AB; Khan MA
    J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol; 2016 Feb; 21(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 27454498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the reliability of classification systems used for distal radius fractures.
    Kural C; Sungur I; Kaya I; Ugras A; Ertürk A; Cetinus E
    Orthopedics; 2010 Nov; 33(11):801. PubMed ID: 21053882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An independent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility evaluation of the new AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System.
    Urrutia J; Zamora T; Yurac R; Campos M; Palma J; Mobarec S; Prada C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(1):E54-8. PubMed ID: 25341990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Four distal radial fracture classification systems tested amongst a large panel of Dutch trauma surgeons.
    Ploegmakers JJ; Mader K; Pennig D; Verheyen CC
    Injury; 2007 Nov; 38(11):1268-72. PubMed ID: 17643439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distal radius fractures are difficult to classify.
    Wæver D; Madsen ML; Rölfing JHD; Borris LC; Henriksen M; Nagel LL; Thorninger R
    Injury; 2018 Jun; 49 Suppl 1():S29-S32. PubMed ID: 29929689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Distal radius fractures: consistency of the classifications].
    de Oliveira Filho OM; Belangero WD; Teles JB
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2004; 50(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 15253028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The IDEAL classification system: a new method for classifying fractures of the distal extremity of the radius - description and reproducibility.
    Belloti JC; dos Santos JB; de Moraes VY; Wink FV; Tamaoki MJ; Faloppa F
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2013; 131(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 24141296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the cooney classification of distal radius fractures between experienced orthopaedic surgeons.
    Jin WJ; Jiang LS; Shen L; Lu H; Cui YM; Zhou Q; Dai LY
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2007 Oct; 32(5):509-11. PubMed ID: 17950210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Classification systems for distal radius fractures.
    Kleinlugtenbelt YV; Groen SR; Ham SJ; Kloen P; Haverlag R; Simons MP; Scholtes VAB; Bhandari M; Goslings JC; Poolman RW
    Acta Orthop; 2017 Dec; 88(6):681-687. PubMed ID: 28612669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Intra- and Interobserver Reproducibility of the New AO/OTA Classification for Distal Radius Fractures Compared with the Fernandez Classification.
    Carula BC; Giostri GS; Bebber F; Batista MFDS; Silva FBD; Novak EM
    Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo); 2022 Dec; 57(6):917-923. PubMed ID: 36540737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Weber Ankle Fracture Classification System Yields Greatest Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability Over AO/OTA and Lauge-Hansen Classification Systems Under Time Constraints in an Asian Population.
    Glen LZQ; Wong JYS; Tay WX; Li TP; Phua SKA; Manohara R; Chee YH
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2023; 62(3):505-510. PubMed ID: 36690511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.