109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23749185)
1. A simple epidural simulator: a blinded study assessing the 'feel' of loss of resistance in four fruits.
Raj D; Williamson RM; Young D; Russell D
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Jul; 30(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 23749185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Loss of resistance: A randomised controlled trial assessing four low-fidelity epidural puncture simulators.
Pedersen TH; Meuli J; Plazikowski EJ; Buttenberg M; Kleine-Brueggeney M; Seidl C; Theiler L; Greif R
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Sep; 34(9):602-608. PubMed ID: 28437262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the Mediseus epidural simulator.
Lee RA; van Zundert TC; van Koesveld JJ; van Zundert AA; Stolker RJ; Wieringa PA; Gatt SP
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2012 Mar; 40(2):311-8. PubMed ID: 22417027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of M43B Lumbar puncture simulator-II as a training tool for identification of the epidural space and lumbar puncture.
Uppal V; Kearns RJ; McGrady EM
Anaesthesia; 2011 Jun; 66(6):493-6. PubMed ID: 21568983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of the force-feedback model for an epidural needle insertion simulator.
Hiemenz L; Stredney D; Schmalbrock P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 50():272-7. PubMed ID: 10180553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The techniques to identify the epidural space do not influence the success rate in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: a comparison between loss-of-resistance and hanging-drop].
Kobayashi Y; Ichimiya T; Sekine R; Toriyabe M; Seki S; Namiki A
Masui; 2001 May; 50(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 11424463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Importance of the needle bevel during spinal and epidural anesthesia.
Baumgarten RK
Reg Anesth; 1995; 20(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 7547661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical impact of epidural anesthesia simulation on short- and long-term learning curve: High- versus low-fidelity model training.
Friedman Z; Siddiqui N; Katznelson R; Devito I; Bould MD; Naik V
Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2009; 34(3):229-32. PubMed ID: 19587620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A proposal of a simple epidural simulator for training novice anesthesiologists.
Jeong SM; Choi JM; Kim JH; Yoo H; Lee S; Seo H; Kim S; Kim SH
J Anesth; 2016 Aug; 30(4):591-5. PubMed ID: 27193185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a new training device to simulate the epidural and subarachnoid spaces for neuraxial anesthesia techniques.
Capogna G; Stirparo S; Caniggia S
Minerva Anestesiol; 2013 Apr; 79(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 23306396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Towards a realistic in vitro experience of epidural Tuohy needle insertion.
Vaughan N; Dubey VN; Wee MY; Isaacs R
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):767-77. PubMed ID: 23636758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Training of epidural anesthesia with pressure-guided method in pediatric patients].
Saito K; Inomata S; Uemura A; Osaka Y; Miyabe M; Toyooka H
Masui; 2002 Aug; 51(8):927-30. PubMed ID: 12229151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experience is not enough: repeated breaches in epidural anesthesia aseptic technique by novice operators despite improved skill.
Friedman Z; Siddiqui N; Katznelson R; Devito I; Davies S
Anesthesiology; 2008 May; 108(5):914-20. PubMed ID: 18431128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia using two different techniques.
Joshi GP; McCarroll SM
Reg Anesth; 1994; 19(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 7999651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The combined plunger pressure-manometer method. A technique for identifying the peridural space].
Bhate H
Anaesthesist; 1992 Apr; 41(4):224-7. PubMed ID: 1590580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Usefulness of Epidrum for teaching identification of the epidural space].
Hirabayashi T; Kawamata T; Sakamoto A; Ikeno S; Minemura H; Ide S; Kurato T; Kawamata M
Masui; 2011 Sep; 60(9):1078-81. PubMed ID: 21950041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usefulness and accuracy of a handheld ultrasound device for epidurssal landmark and depth assessment by anesthesiology residents.
Kimizuka M; Tokinaga Y; Taguchi M; Takahashi K; Yamakage M
J Anesth; 2022 Dec; 36(6):693-697. PubMed ID: 36029336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Instrumentation of the loss-of-resistance technique for epidural needle insertion.
Tran D; Hor KW; Kamani AA; Lessoway VA; Rohling RN
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Mar; 56(3):820-7. PubMed ID: 19174346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The learning curve associated with the epidural technique using the Episure™ AutoDetect™ versus conventional glass syringe: an open-label, randomized, controlled, crossover trial of experienced anesthesiologists in obstetric patients.
Carabuena JM; Mitani AM; Liu X; Kodali BS; Tsen LC
Anesth Analg; 2013 Jan; 116(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 23223103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound imaging improves learning curves in obstetric epidural anesthesia: a preliminary study.
Grau T; Bartusseck E; Conradi R; Martin E; Motsch J
Can J Anaesth; 2003 Dec; 50(10):1047-50. PubMed ID: 14656785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
