These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23749591)

  • 1. Attitudes towards cross-border reproductive care among infertile Japanese patients.
    Hibino Y; Shimazono Y; Kambayashi Y; Hitomi Y; Nakamura H
    Environ Health Prev Med; 2013 Nov; 18(6):477-84. PubMed ID: 23749591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-border reproductive care among French patients: experiences in Greece, Spain and Belgium.
    Rozée Gomez V; de La Rochebrochard E
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Nov; 28(11):3103-10. PubMed ID: 23943796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Banning reproductive travel: Turkey's ART legislation and third-party assisted reproduction.
    Gürtin ZB
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Nov; 23(5):555-64. PubMed ID: 21962527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors that infertile couples from mainland China may take into consideration for cross-border reproductive care - A cross-sectional questionnaire study.
    Pan LF; Wang PH; Lin LT; Hsu S; Tsui KH
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 33495003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross border reproductive care (CBRC): a growing global phenomenon with multidimensional implications (a systematic and critical review).
    Salama M; Isachenko V; Isachenko E; Rahimi G; Mallmann P; Westphal LM; Inhorn MC; Patrizio P
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2018 Jul; 35(7):1277-1288. PubMed ID: 29808382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-border reproductive care use by women with infertility in Hong Kong: cross-sectional survey.
    Ng DYT; Lui EMW; Lai SF; Law TSM; Wong GCY; Ng EHY
    Hong Kong Med J; 2020 Dec; 26(6):492-499. PubMed ID: 33323537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patient and clinician experiences with cross-border reproductive care: A systematic review.
    McLean L; Ros ST; Hollond C; Stofan J; Quinn GP
    Patient Educ Couns; 2022 Jul; 105(7):1943-1952. PubMed ID: 35339328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intended parents' motivations and information and support needs when seeking extraterritorial compensated surrogacy.
    Hammarberg K; Stafford-Bell M; Everingham S
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2015 Nov; 31(5):689-96. PubMed ID: 26371710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Egg Production and Donation: A New Frontier in the Global Landscape of Cross-Border Reproductive Care: Ethical Concerns.
    Neri M; Turillazzi E; Pascale N; Riezzo I; Pomara C
    Curr Pharm Biotechnol; 2016; 17(4):316-20. PubMed ID: 26775650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-border reproductive healthcare attitudes and behaviours among women living in Florence, Italy.
    Meier S; Ramos-Ortiz J; Basille K; D'Eramo AC; Diaconu AM; Flores LJ; Hottle S; Mason-Yeary K; Ruiz Y; DeMaria AL
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Feb; 22(1):238. PubMed ID: 35189893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-border reproductive care in North America: a pilot study testing a prospective data collection program for in vitro fertilization clinics in Canada and the United States.
    Hughes EG; Sawyer A; DeJean D; Adamson GD
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Mar; 105(3):786-790. PubMed ID: 26690009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproductive outsourcing: an empirical ethics account of cross-border reproductive care in Canada.
    Couture V; Drouin R; Moutquin JM; Monnier P; Bouffard C
    J Med Ethics; 2019 Jan; 45(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 30301813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of egg donation deliveries from domestic and overseas sources on maternal care: a questionnaire survey of Japanese perinatal physicians.
    Hibino Y; Shimazono Y
    Environ Health Prev Med; 2014 Jul; 19(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 24700241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What is the Responsibility of Australian Medical Professionals Whose Patients Travel Abroad for Assisted Reproduction?
    Millbank J
    Med Law Rev; 2019 Aug; 27(3):365-389. PubMed ID: 30690476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The global landscape of cross-border reproductive care: twenty key findings for the new millennium.
    Inhorn MC; Patrizio P
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 24(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 22366965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motivations and experiences of patients seeking cross-border reproductive care: the Australian and New Zealand context.
    Rodino IS; Goedeke S; Nowoweiski S
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Nov; 102(5):1422-31. PubMed ID: 25241371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-border reproductive care in the USA: Who comes, why do they come, what do they purchase?
    Jacobson H
    Reprod Biomed Soc Online; 2020 Nov; 11():42-47. PubMed ID: 33204864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extraterritoriality for cross-border reproductive care: should states act against citizens travelling abroad for illegal infertility treatment?
    Van Hoof W; Pennings G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Nov; 23(5):546-54. PubMed ID: 21955486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Legal perspectives on cross-border reproductive care.
    Crockin SL
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Dec; 23(7):811-3. PubMed ID: 22056635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abandoned by the State, betrayed by the Church: Italian experiences of cross-border reproductive care.
    Zanini G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Nov; 23(5):565-72. PubMed ID: 21955488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.