These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23749649)

  • 1. Impact of a 4th generation iterative reconstruction technique on image quality in low-dose computed tomography of the chest in immunocompromised patients.
    Laqmani A; Buhk JH; Henes FO; Klink T; Sehner S; von Schultzendorff HC; Hammerle D; Nagel HD; Adam G; Regier M
    Rofo; 2013 Aug; 185(8):749-57. PubMed ID: 23749649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 256-MDCT for evaluation of urolithiasis: iterative reconstruction allows for a significant reduction of the applied radiation dose while maintaining high subjective and objective image quality.
    Veldhoen S; Laqmani A; Derlin T; Karul M; Hammerle D; Buhk JH; Sehner S; Nagel HD; Chun F; Adam G; Regier M
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2014; 58(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 24581030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Iterative Model Reconstruction (IMR) in MDCT Below 2 mSv for the Detection of Urinary Calculi: Diagnostic Accuracy and Image Quality in Comparison to Filtered Back-Projection and 4th Generation Iterative Reconstruction (iDose4).
    Schmidt-Holtz J; Laqmani A; Butscheidt S; Kurfürst M; Avanesov M; Behzadi C; Spink C; Veldhoen S; Nagel HD; Adam G; Regier M
    Rofo; 2018 Jul; 190(7):630-636. PubMed ID: 29966156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dose reduction in computed tomography of the chest: image quality of iterative reconstructions at a 50% radiation dose compared to filtered back projection at a 100% radiation dose.
    May MS; Eller A; Stahl C; Wuest W; Scharf M; Hammon M; Dankerl P; Schlechtweg PM; Allmendinger T; Sedlmair M; Schmidt B; Uder M; Lell MM
    Rofo; 2014 Jun; 186(6):576-84. PubMed ID: 24477504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feasibility of low-dose CT with spectral shaping and third-generation iterative reconstruction in evaluating interstitial lung diseases associated with connective tissue disease: an intra-individual comparison study.
    Xu X; Sui X; Song L; Huang Y; Ge Y; Jin Z; Song W
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4529-4537. PubMed ID: 30737567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality.
    Yanagawa M; Gyobu T; Leung AN; Kawai M; Kawata Y; Sumikawa H; Honda O; Tomiyama N
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Knowledge-based Iterative Model Reconstruction and Hybrid Reconstruction Techniques for Liver CT Evaluation of Hypervascular Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Park HJ; Lee JM; Park SB; Lee JB; Jeong YK; Yoon JH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(6):863-871. PubMed ID: 27331929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for ultralow-dose computed tomography of the lung: a pilot study.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Tanami Y; Shiomi E; Sugiura H; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Aug; 47(8):482-9. PubMed ID: 22766910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hosokawa T; Tanami Y; Sugiura H; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4185-95. PubMed ID: 22883532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of image quality and visibility of normal and abnormal findings at submillisievert chest CT using filtered back projection, iterative model reconstruction (IMR) and iDose
    Laqmani A; Avanesov M; Butscheidt S; Kurfürst M; Sehner S; Schmidt-Holtz J; Derlin T; Behzadi C; Nagel HD; Adam G; Regier M
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):1971-1979. PubMed ID: 27776648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction on lung lesion conspicuity at MDCT: does one size fit all?
    Botelho MP; Agrawal R; Gonzalez-Guindalini FD; Hart EM; Patel SK; Töre HG; Yaghmai V
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e726-33. PubMed ID: 23928232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultralow-Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography: Comparison of 2 Iterative Reconstruction Techniques in a Prospective Clinical Study.
    Khawaja RD; Singh S; Blake M; Harisinghani M; Choy G; Karaosmanoglu A; Padole A; Pourjabbar S; Do S; Kalra MK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):489-98. PubMed ID: 26182223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Iterative reconstruction of pulmonary MDCT angiography: effects on image quality, effective dose and estimated organ dose to the breast.
    Zizka J; Ryska P; Stepanovska J; Poulova Z; Klzo L; Grepl J; Cermakova E
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2014 Jun; 158(2):259-64. PubMed ID: 24026145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparisons of image quality and radiation dose between iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection reconstruction algorithms in 256-MDCT coronary angiography.
    Hou Y; Liu X; Xv S; Guo W; Guo Q
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Sep; 199(3):588-94. PubMed ID: 22915398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standard dose versus low-dose abdominal and pelvic CT: comparison between filtered back projection versus adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D.
    Gervaise A; Osemont B; Louis M; Lecocq S; Teixeira P; Blum A
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Jan; 95(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 23988483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA
    Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative study based on image quality and clinical task performance for CT reconstruction algorithms in radiotherapy.
    Li H; Dolly S; Chen HC; Anastasio MA; Low DA; Li HH; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Gay H; Mutic S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 27455472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dose reduction in abdominal computed tomography: intraindividual comparison of image quality of full-dose standard and half-dose iterative reconstructions with dual-source computed tomography.
    May MS; Wüst W; Brand M; Stahl C; Allmendinger T; Schmidt B; Uder M; Lell MM
    Invest Radiol; 2011 Jul; 46(7):465-70. PubMed ID: 21467948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-pitch, 120 kVp/30 mAs, low-dose dual-source chest CT with iterative reconstruction: Prospective evaluation of radiation dose reduction and image quality compared with those of standard-pitch low-dose chest CT in healthy adult volunteers.
    Lim HK; Ha HI; Hwang HJ; Lee K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0211097. PubMed ID: 30677082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiation Dose Consideration in Kidney Stone CT Examinations: Integration of Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms With Routine Clinical Practice.
    Andrabi Y; Pianykh O; Agrawal M; Kambadakone A; Blake MA; Sahani DV
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):1055-63. PubMed ID: 25905941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.