These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23749679)

  • 1. Automatic identification of familiar faces.
    Jung K; Ruthruff E; Gaspelin N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1438-50. PubMed ID: 23749679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Familiar Face Detection in 180 ms.
    Visconti di Oleggio Castello M; Gobbini MI
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136548. PubMed ID: 26305788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterizing the spatio-temporal dynamics of the neural events occurring prior to and up to overt recognition of famous faces.
    Jemel B; Schuller AM; Goffaux V
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2289-305. PubMed ID: 19642891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The activation of visual memory for facial identity is task-dependent: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2014 May; 54():124-34. PubMed ID: 24657481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The movement advantage in famous and unfamiliar faces: a comparison of point-light displays and shape-normalised avatar stimuli.
    Bennetts RJ; Kim J; Burke D; Brooks KR; Lucey S; Saragih J; Robbins RA
    Perception; 2013; 42(9):950-70. PubMed ID: 24386715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Telling faces together: Learning new faces through exposure to multiple instances.
    Andrews S; Jenkins R; Cursiter H; Burton AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):2041-50. PubMed ID: 25607814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do Arabic numerals activate magnitude automatically? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Ford N; Reynolds MG
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1528-1533. PubMed ID: 27025502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Face learning and the emergence of view-independent face recognition: an event-related brain potential study.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1320-9. PubMed ID: 23583970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The ups and downs of face perception: evidence for holistic encoding of upright and inverted faces.
    Murray JE
    Perception; 2004; 33(4):387-98. PubMed ID: 15222387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Face familiarity decisions take 200 msec in the human brain: electrophysiological evidence from a go/no-go speeded task.
    Caharel S; Ramon M; Rossion B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Jan; 26(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 23915049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual learning in face processing: comparison facilitates face recognition.
    Dwyer DM; Vladeanu M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):2055-67. PubMed ID: 19235097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Event-related potential correlates of repetition priming for ignored faces.
    Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR; Wiese H; Burton AM
    Neuroreport; 2007 Aug; 18(13):1305-9. PubMed ID: 17762702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Revisiting the earliest electrophysiological correlate of familiar face recognition.
    Huang W; Wu X; Hu L; Wang L; Ding Y; Qu Z
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Oct; 120():42-53. PubMed ID: 28684327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Familiarity facilitates the corticocortical processing of face perception.
    Goto Y; Kinoe H; Nakashima T; Tobimatsu S
    Neuroreport; 2005 Aug; 16(12):1329-34. PubMed ID: 16056134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of Degraded distractors on (Nondegraded) target identification.
    Kritikos A; Pavlis A
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 183(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 17618425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. N250 ERP correlates of the acquisition of face representations across different images.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR; Burton AM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 18702593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted.
    Keyes H; Brady N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):840-7. PubMed ID: 20198537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.