These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23750016)
1. The psi-marginal adaptive method: How to give nuisance parameters the attention they deserve (no more, no less). Prins N J Vis; 2013 Jun; 13(7):3. PubMed ID: 23750016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficient estimation of stereo thresholds: What slope should be assumed for the psychometric function? Serrano-Pedraza I; Vancleef K; Herbert W; Goodship N; Woodhouse M; Read JCA PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0226822. PubMed ID: 31895925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian adaptive estimation of arbitrary points on a psychometric function. García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):147-74. PubMed ID: 17535585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Principles of an adaptive method for measuring the slope of the psychometric function. King-Smith PE; Rose D Vision Res; 1997 Jun; 37(12):1595-604. PubMed ID: 9231226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian adaptive estimation of threshold versus contrast external noise functions: the quick TvC method. Lesmes LA; Jeon ST; Lu ZL; Dosher BA Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(19):3160-76. PubMed ID: 16782167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identifying steep psychometric function slope quickly in clinical applications. Turpin A; Jankovic D; McKendrick A Vision Res; 2010 Nov; 50(23):2476-85. PubMed ID: 20801144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. King-Smith PE; Grigsby SS; Vingrys AJ; Benes SC; Supowit A Vision Res; 1994 Apr; 34(7):885-912. PubMed ID: 8160402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sampling plans for fitting the psychometric function. García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R Span J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 8(2):256-89. PubMed ID: 16255393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary. Klein SA Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1421-55. PubMed ID: 11800466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The psychometric function: the lapse rate revisited. Prins N J Vis; 2012 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 22715196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determining thresholds using adaptive procedures and psychometric fits: evaluating efficiency using theory, simulations, and human experiments. Karmali F; Chaudhuri SE; Yi Y; Merfeld DM Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):773-89. PubMed ID: 26645306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Signal detection theory and vestibular perception: III. Estimating unbiased fit parameters for psychometric functions. Chaudhuri SE; Merfeld DM Exp Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 225(1):133-46. PubMed ID: 23250442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utility of a dynamic termination criterion in the ZEST adaptive threshold method. Anderson AJ Vision Res; 2003 Jan; 43(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 12536138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of optimal data placement for psychometric function estimation: a computer simulation. Lam CF; Dubno JR; Mills JH J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):1969-76. PubMed ID: 10530021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian adaptive estimation of the contrast sensitivity function: the quick CSF method. Lesmes LA; Lu ZL; Baek J; Albright TD J Vis; 2010 Mar; 10(3):17.1-21. PubMed ID: 20377294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]