These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23750966)

  • 1. Top-down influences of written text on perceived clarity of degraded speech.
    Sohoglu E; Peelle JE; Carlyon RP; Davis MH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):186-99. PubMed ID: 23750966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combined effects of form- and meaning-based predictability on perceived clarity of speech.
    Signoret C; Johnsrude I; Classon E; Rudner M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Feb; 44(2):277-285. PubMed ID: 28557490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lexical Effects on the Perceived Clarity of Noise-Vocoded Speech in Younger and Older Listeners.
    Tamati TN; Sevich VA; Clausing EM; Moberly AC
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():837644. PubMed ID: 35432072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive top-down integration of prior knowledge during speech perception.
    Sohoglu E; Peelle JE; Carlyon RP; Davis MH
    J Neurosci; 2012 Jun; 32(25):8443-53. PubMed ID: 22723684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural tracking measures of speech intelligibility: Manipulating intelligibility while keeping acoustics unchanged.
    Karunathilake IMD; Kulasingham JP; Simon JZ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Dec; 120(49):e2309166120. PubMed ID: 38032934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of speech degradation on top-down repair: phonemic restoration with simulations of cochlear implants and combined electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Başkent D
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 13(5):683-92. PubMed ID: 22569838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expectations boost the reconstruction of auditory features from electrophysiological responses to noisy speech.
    Corcoran AW; Perera R; Koroma M; Kouider S; Hohwy J; Andrillon T
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 Jan; 33(3):691-708. PubMed ID: 35253871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transient and sustained cortical activity elicited by connected speech of varying intelligibility.
    Tiitinen H; Miettinen I; Alku P; May PJ
    BMC Neurosci; 2012 Dec; 13():157. PubMed ID: 23276297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
    Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual learning of degraded speech by minimizing prediction error.
    Sohoglu E; Davis MH
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Mar; 113(12):E1747-56. PubMed ID: 26957596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lateralized Cerebral Processing of Abstract Linguistic Structure in Clear and Degraded Speech.
    Meng Q; Hegner YL; Giblin I; McMahon C; Johnson BW
    Cereb Cortex; 2021 Jan; 31(1):591-602. PubMed ID: 32901245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory skills and brain morphology predict individual differences in adaptation to degraded speech.
    Erb J; Henry MJ; Eisner F; Obleser J
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2154-64. PubMed ID: 22609577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between listeners' nonnative speech recognition and categorization abilities.
    Atagi E; Bent T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):EL44-50. PubMed ID: 25618098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No evidence of relation between working memory and perception of interrupted speech in young adults.
    Nagaraj NK; Knapp AN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Aug; 138(2):EL145-50. PubMed ID: 26328740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cortical Measures of Phoneme-Level Speech Encoding Correlate with the Perceived Clarity of Natural Speech.
    Di Liberto GM; Crosse MJ; Lalor EC
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 29662947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of visual cues on top-down restoration of temporally interrupted speech, with and without further degradations.
    Benard MR; Başkent D
    Hear Res; 2015 Oct; 328():24-33. PubMed ID: 26117407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Previous exposure to intact speech increases intelligibility of its digitally degraded counterpart as a function of stimulus complexity.
    Hakonen M; May PJC; Alho J; Alku P; Jokinen E; Jääskeläinen IP; Tiitinen H
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 125():131-143. PubMed ID: 26477651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does Signal Degradation Affect Top-Down Processing of Speech?
    Wagner A; Pals C; de Blecourt CM; Sarampalis A; Başkent D
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():297-306. PubMed ID: 27080670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Top-Down Modulation of Auditory-Motor Integration during Speech Production: The Role of Working Memory.
    Guo Z; Wu X; Li W; Jones JA; Yan N; Sheft S; Liu P; Liu H
    J Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 37(43):10323-10333. PubMed ID: 28951450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.