These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23750966)

  • 21. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Memory disruption by irrelevant noise-vocoded speech: Effects of native language and the number of frequency bands.
    Ellermeier W; Kattner F; Ueda K; Doumoto K; Nakajima Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1561-9. PubMed ID: 26428793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perceptual learning of interrupted speech.
    Benard MR; Başkent D
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e58149. PubMed ID: 23469266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Top-down restoration of speech in cochlear-implant users.
    Bhargava P; Gaudrain E; Başkent D
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():113-23. PubMed ID: 24368138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Human Neural Alpha Response to Speech is a Proxy of Attentional Control.
    Wöstmann M; Lim SJ; Obleser J
    Cereb Cortex; 2017 Jun; 27(6):3307-3317. PubMed ID: 28334352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Linguistic, perceptual, and cognitive factors underlying musicians' benefits in noise-degraded speech perception.
    Yoo J; Bidelman GM
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():189-195. PubMed ID: 30978607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Generalization of perceptual learning of vocoded speech.
    Hervais-Adelman AG; Davis MH; Johnsrude IS; Taylor KJ; Carlyon RP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):283-95. PubMed ID: 21077718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of irrelevant speech and traffic noise on speech perception and cognitive performance in elementary school children.
    Klatte M; Meis M; Sukowski H; Schick A
    Noise Health; 2007; 9(36):64-74. PubMed ID: 18025757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. When sentences live up to your expectations.
    Tuennerhoff J; Noppeney U
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):641-653. PubMed ID: 26363344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Does the degree of linguistic experience (native versus nonnative) modulate the degree to which listeners can benefit from a delay between the onset of the maskers and the onset of the target speech?
    Ben-David BM; Avivi-Reich M; Schneider BA
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():9-18. PubMed ID: 27496539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of simultaneous text on the recall of noise-degraded speech.
    Grossman I; Rajan R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 May; 43(5):986-1001. PubMed ID: 28263637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Working memory, age, and hearing loss: susceptibility to hearing aid distortion.
    Arehart KH; Souza P; Baca R; Kates JM
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 23291963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceptual learning of noise vocoded words: effects of feedback and lexicality.
    Hervais-Adelman A; Davis MH; Johnsrude IS; Carlyon RP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):460-74. PubMed ID: 18377182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Listeners Experience Linguistic Masking Release in Noise-Vocoded Speech-in-Speech Recognition.
    Viswanathan N; Kokkinakis K; Williams BT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Feb; 61(2):428-435. PubMed ID: 29396580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of presentation level on memory performance.
    Heinrich A; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):524-32. PubMed ID: 21278574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Neural Tracking Measures of Speech Intelligibility: Manipulating Intelligibility while Keeping Acoustics Unchanged.
    Karunathilake IMD; Kulasingham JP; Simon JZ
    bioRxiv; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37292644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences.
    Davis MH; Johnsrude IS; Hervais-Adelman A; Taylor K; McGettigan C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 May; 134(2):222-41. PubMed ID: 15869347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effortful listening: the processing of degraded speech depends critically on attention.
    Wild CJ; Yusuf A; Wilson DE; Peelle JE; Davis MH; Johnsrude IS
    J Neurosci; 2012 Oct; 32(40):14010-21. PubMed ID: 23035108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.