107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23751006)
21. Inhibitory control in memory: evidence for negative priming in free recall.
Marsh JE; Beaman CP; Hughes RW; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1377-88. PubMed ID: 22468802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Noncriterial recollection influences metacognitive monitoring and control processes.
Brewer GA; Marsh RL; Clark-Foos A; Meeks JT
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1936-42. PubMed ID: 20198538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Remembered study mode: support for the distinctiveness account of the production effect.
Ozubko JD; Major J; MacLeod CM
Memory; 2014; 22(5):509-24. PubMed ID: 23713784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Effect of Presentation Mode and Production Type on Word Memory for Hearing Impaired Signers.
Swead RT; Mama Y; Icht M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):875-884. PubMed ID: 30479260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The production effect in memory: evidence that distinctiveness underlies the benefit.
Ozubko JD; Macleod CM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1543-7. PubMed ID: 20804284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Directed forgetting meets the production effect: distinctive processing is resistant to intentional forgetting.
Hourihan KL; Macleod CM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Dec; 62(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 19071992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A computational account of the production effect: Still playing twenty questions with nature.
Jamieson RK; Mewhort DJ; Hockley WE
Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 27244357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Silent reading rate and memory span.
Poirier M; Schweickert R; Oliver J
Memory; 2005; 13(3-4):380-7. PubMed ID: 15948624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Production improves recognition and reduces intrusions in between-subject designs: An updated meta-analysis.
Fawcett JM; Baldwin MM; Whitridge JW; Swab M; Malayang K; Hiscock B; Drakes DH; Willoughby HV
Can J Exp Psychol; 2023 Mar; 77(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 36521123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Context-dependent effects of background colour in free recall with spatially grouped words.
Sakai T; Isarida TK; Isarida T
Memory; 2010 Oct; 18(7):743-53. PubMed ID: 20835947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The ecology of self-monitoring effects on memory of verbal productions: Does speaking to someone make a difference?
Lafleur A; Boucher VJ
Conscious Cogn; 2015 Nov; 36():139-46. PubMed ID: 26141662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.
Huff MJ; Bodner GE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23356241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A causal contiguity effect that persists across time scales.
Kiliç A; Criss AH; Howard MW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):297-303. PubMed ID: 22582969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparing comprehension measured by multiple-choice and open-ended questions.
Ozuru Y; Briner S; Kurby CA; McNamara DS
Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Sep; 67(3):215-27. PubMed ID: 24041303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
Halamish V; Bjork RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reading aloud: spelling-sound translation uses central attention.
O'Malley S; Reynolds MG; Stolz JA; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):422-9. PubMed ID: 18315417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Widening the boundaries of the production effect.
Forrin ND; Macleod CM; Ozubko JD
Mem Cognit; 2012 Oct; 40(7):1046-55. PubMed ID: 22528825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The benefits of studying by production . . . And of studying production: Introduction to the special issue on the production effect in memory.
Bodner GE; MacLeod CM
Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 27244350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. My word! Interference from reading object names implies a role for competition during picture name retrieval.
Vitkovitch M; Cooper E
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1229-40. PubMed ID: 22390174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The effect of orthographic familiarity on recall of stimulus items read aloud].
Yokoyama S
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1991 Aug; 62(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 1749128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
