These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23751006)

  • 41. Recall of prose as a function of age and input modality.
    Taub HA; Kline GE
    J Gerontol; 1978 Sep; 33(5):725-30. PubMed ID: 299562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Characterizing production: the production effect is eliminated for unusual voices unless they are frequent at study.
    Wakeham-Lewis RM; Ozubko J; Fawcett JM
    Memory; 2022 Nov; 30(10):1319-1333. PubMed ID: 36107805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Semantic involvement in reading aloud: evidence from a nonword training study.
    McKay A; Davis C; Savage G; Castles A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Nov; 34(6):1495-517. PubMed ID: 18980410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Confabulation in healthy aging is related to interference of overlearned, semantically similar information on episodic memory recall.
    Dalla Barba G; Attali E; La Corte V
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2010 Jul; 32(6):655-60. PubMed ID: 20063257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The production effect is consistent over material variations: support for the distinctiveness account.
    MacLeod CM; Ozubko JD; Hourihan KL; Major JC
    Memory; 2022 Sep; 30(8):1000-1007. PubMed ID: 35635318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Neural correlates of the production effect: An fMRI study.
    Bailey LM; Bodner GE; Matheson HE; Stewart BM; Roddick K; O'Neil K; Simmons M; Lambert AM; Krigolson OE; Newman AJ; Fawcett JM
    Brain Cogn; 2021 Aug; 152():105757. PubMed ID: 34130081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The written voice: implicit memory effects of voice characteristics following silent reading and auditory presentation.
    Abramson M
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Dec; 105(3 Pt 2):1171-86. PubMed ID: 18380117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The longer we have to forget the more we remember: The ironic effect of postcue duration in item-based directed forgetting.
    Bancroft TD; Hockley WE; Farquhar R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):691-9. PubMed ID: 22845067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Rhythmic versus phonemic interference in delayed auditory feedback.
    Kaspar K; Rübeling H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):932-43. PubMed ID: 20966383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Auditioning the distinctiveness account: Expanding the production effect to the auditory modality reveals the superiority of writing over vocalising.
    Mama Y; Icht M
    Memory; 2016; 24(1):98-113. PubMed ID: 25483326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Revisiting the novelty effect: when familiarity, not novelty, enhances memory.
    Poppenk J; Köhler S; Moscovitch M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1321-30. PubMed ID: 20804299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Establishing and explaining the testing effect in free recall for young children.
    Lipowski SL; Pyc MA; Dunlosky J; Rawson KA
    Dev Psychol; 2014 Apr; 50(4):994-1000. PubMed ID: 24294884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Adaptive memory: determining the proximate mechanisms responsible for the memorial advantages of survival processing.
    Burns DJ; Burns SA; Hwang AJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):206-18. PubMed ID: 21244114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Erroneous and veridical recall are not two sides of the same coin: Evidence from semantic distraction in free recall.
    Marsh JE; Hughes RW; Sörqvist P; Beaman CP; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1728-40. PubMed ID: 25938326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Contextual match and cue-independence of retrieval-induced forgetting: Testing the prediction of the model by Norman, Newman, and Detre (2007).
    Hanczakowski M; Mazzoni G
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):953-8. PubMed ID: 23088549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation.
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):734-48. PubMed ID: 16822144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Production Improves Visual and Auditory Text Memory in Younger and Older Adults.
    Icht M; Taitelbaum-Swead R; Mama Y
    Gerontology; 2022; 68(5):578-586. PubMed ID: 34530426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Recall of story schema categories by reading disabled adults: effect of mode of presentation.
    Gold R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Apr; 56(2):387-96. PubMed ID: 6866649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Strategic retrieval and retrieval orientation in reality monitoring studied by event-related potentials (ERPs).
    Rosburg T; Johansson M; Mecklinger A
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Feb; 51(3):557-71. PubMed ID: 23168131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Retrieval experience as a modifier of future encoding: another test effect.
    Bjork EL; Storm BC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 21574746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.