These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23751010)

  • 21. The effectiveness of test-enhanced learning depends on trait test anxiety and working-memory capacity.
    Tse CS; Pu X
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Sep; 18(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 22774786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory.
    Zhang B; Zhang JX; Huang S; Kong L; Wang S
    Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2356-61. PubMed ID: 21964327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neuro-Cognitive Intervention for Working Memory: Preliminary Results and Future Directions.
    Bree KD; Beljan P
    Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2016; 5(3):202-13. PubMed ID: 27191217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cognitive capacity in self-directed learning: Evidence of middle school students' executive attention to resist distraction.
    Uus Õ; Seitlinger PC; Ley TT
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Sep; 209():103089. PubMed ID: 32629207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Map learning and working memory: Multimodal learning strategies.
    Knight MJ; Tlauka M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jun; 71(6):1405-1418. PubMed ID: 28471296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Incidental learning of probability information is differentially affected by the type of visual working memory representation.
    van Lamsweerde AE; Beck MR
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Dec; 69(4):283-96. PubMed ID: 26010021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Backward inhibition in a task of switching attention within verbal working memory.
    Bao M; Li ZH; Chen XC; Zhang DR
    Brain Res Bull; 2006 Mar; 69(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 16533672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Response selection in dual task paradigms: observations from random generation tasks.
    Dirnberger G; Jahanshahi M
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 201(3):535-48. PubMed ID: 20232508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The efficacy of self-paced study in multitrial learning.
    de Jonge M; Tabbers HK; Pecher D; Jang Y; Zeelenberg R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):851-8. PubMed ID: 25133515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Adam KC; Mance I; Fukuda K; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 27(8):1601-16. PubMed ID: 25811710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Distinct contributions of attention and working memory to visual statistical learning and ensemble processing.
    Hall MG; Mattingley JB; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1112-23. PubMed ID: 26010589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Short-term memory in autism spectrum disorder.
    Poirier M; Martin JS; Gaigg SB; Bowler DM
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2011 Feb; 120(1):247-52. PubMed ID: 21319933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Interference within the focus of attention: working memory tasks reflect more than temporary maintenance.
    Shipstead Z; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):277-89. PubMed ID: 22612165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Selection of multiple cued items is possible during visual short-term memory maintenance.
    Matsukura M; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1625-46. PubMed ID: 25824888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Planning on Autopilot? Associative Contributions to Proactive Control.
    Prieto I; Tran DMD; Livesey EJ
    Cognition; 2023 Feb; 231():105321. PubMed ID: 36402086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The stability of working memory: do previous tasks influence complex span?
    Healey MK; Hasher L; Danilova E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):573-85. PubMed ID: 21767041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Verbal makes it positive, spatial makes it negative: working memory biases judgments, attention, and moods.
    Storbeck J; Watson P
    Emotion; 2014 Dec; 14(6):1072-86. PubMed ID: 24999914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Actively learning object names across ambiguous situations.
    Kachergis G; Yu C; Shiffrin RM
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Jan; 5(1):200-13. PubMed ID: 23335580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Observed attention allocation processes in category learning.
    Matsuka T; Corter JE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Jul; 61(7):1067-97. PubMed ID: 18938284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Functional independence in resting-state connectivity facilitates higher-order cognition.
    James GA; Kearney-Ramos TE; Young JA; Kilts CD; Gess JL; Fausett JS
    Brain Cogn; 2016 Jun; 105():78-87. PubMed ID: 27105037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.