115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23751017)
1. Evaluating clinical significance: incorporating robust statistics with normative comparison tests.
van Wieringen K; Cribbie RA
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 May; 67(2):213-30. PubMed ID: 23751017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing clinical significance using robust normative comparisons.
Mangardich H; Cribbie RA
Psychother Res; 2015; 25(2):239-48. PubMed ID: 24576179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychiatric outcome studies (POS): does treatment help the patients? A Popperian approach to research in clinical psychiatry.
Bech P; Lunde M; Bech-Andersen G; Lindberg L; Martiny K
Nord J Psychiatry; 2007; 61 Suppl 46():4-34. PubMed ID: 17365777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Recommendations for applying tests of equivalence.
Cribbie RA; Gruman JA; Arpin-Cribbie CA
J Clin Psychol; 2004 Jan; 60(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14692005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A note on statistical power in multi-site randomized trials with multiple treatments at each site.
Liu XS
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 May; 67(2):231-47. PubMed ID: 23710937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robust tests of equivalence for k independent groups.
Koh A; Cribbie R
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):426-34. PubMed ID: 23043500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of non-normality on test statistics for one-way independent groups designs.
Cribbie RA; Fiksenbaum L; Keselman HJ; Wilcox RR
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2012 Feb; 65(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 21426313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Piloting a practice research network: a 12-month evaluation of the Human Givens approach in primary care at a general medical practice.
Andrews W; Twigg E; Minami T; Johnson G
Psychol Psychother; 2011 Dec; 84(4):389-405. PubMed ID: 22903882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of five two-sample location tests for skewed distributions with unequal variances.
Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Sep; 30(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19577012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Power and measures of effect size in analysis of variance with fixed versus random nested factors.
Siemer M; Joormann J
Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):497-517. PubMed ID: 14664685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose-effect relations and responsive regulation of treatment duration: the good enough level.
Barkham M; Connell J; Stiles WB; Miles JN; Margison F; Evans C; Mellor-Clark J
J Consult Clin Psychol; 2006 Feb; 74(1):160-7. PubMed ID: 16551153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Equivalence tests for comparing correlation and regression coefficients.
Counsell A; Cribbie RA
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):292-309. PubMed ID: 25346486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using Johnson's transformation and robust estimators with heteroscedastic test statistics: an examination of the effects of non-normality and heterogeneity in the non-orthogonal two-way ANOVA design.
Luh WM; Guo JH
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2001 May; 54(Pt 1):79-94. PubMed ID: 11393903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Differences between patients classified as "recovered" or "improved" and "unchanged" or "deteriorated" in a psychotherapy outcome study].
Geiser F; Imbierowicz K; Conrad R; Schilling G; Liedtke R
Z Psychosom Med Psychother; 2001; 47(3):250-61. PubMed ID: 11568863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robust and bootstrap testing procedures for bioequivalence.
Shen CF; Iglewicz B
J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Mar; 4(1):65-90. PubMed ID: 8019585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating clinical significance through equivalence testing: extending the normative comparisons approach.
Cribbie RA; Arpin-Cribbie CA
Psychother Res; 2009 Nov; 19(6):677-86. PubMed ID: 19634049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A robust approach for analyzing unbalanced factorial designs with fixed levels.
Vallejo G; Ato M; Fernández MP
Behav Res Methods; 2010 May; 42(2):607-17. PubMed ID: 20479192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Young adults in psychoanalytic psychotherapy: patient characteristics and therapy outcome.
Philips B; Wennberg P; Werbart A; Schubert J
Psychol Psychother; 2006 Mar; 79(Pt 1):89-106. PubMed ID: 16611424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Power of a test that is robust against variance heterogeneity.
Overall JE; Atlas RS; Gibson JM
Psychol Rep; 1995 Aug; 77(1):155-9. PubMed ID: 7501755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Does improvement of symptoms four weeks after the begin of psychodynamic inpatient psychotherapy correspond to long term outcome?].
Franke GH; Hoffmann T; Frommer J
Z Psychosom Med Psychother; 2005; 51(4):360-72. PubMed ID: 16402334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
