194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2375123)
1. Interprofessional code. Prepared jointly by the State Medical Society of Wisconsin and the State Bar of Wisconsin: 1990.
Wis Med J; 1990 Jul; 89(7):423-46. PubMed ID: 2375123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Principles of cooperation in Medical-Legal Matters: a foreword. The Connecticut Bar Association and the Connecticut State Medical Association.
Walzer RS
Conn Med; 1998 Oct; 62(10):605-14. PubMed ID: 9821725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Interprofessional Code of Cooperation between the Tennessee Bar Association and the Tennessee Medical Association.
J Tenn Med Assoc; 1992 Apr; 85(4):195-200. PubMed ID: 1564936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Kansas City doctors and lawyers agree on an Interprofessional Code.
Badger ED; Abele RC
Mo Med; 1996 Apr; 93(4):161-3. PubMed ID: 8935972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New medical/legal interprofessional code for Louisiana undergoing development.[The Medical-Legal Interprofessional Committee. The Louisiana State Medical Society and The Louisiana Bar Association].
Marks HW
J La State Med Soc; 1993 Jun; 145(6):279-87. PubMed ID: 8340695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interprofessional code. Kentucky Medical Association and Kentucky Bar Association.
J Ky Med Assoc; 1997 Nov; 95(11):469-73. PubMed ID: 9392934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Attorney/physician. Guidelines for inter-professional conduct.
Weber RD
Mich Med; 1990 Oct; 89(10):22-4. PubMed ID: 2233403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Regional medico-legal centre. Experience in Lyon].
Roche L
Sem Hop; 1969 Jun; 45(30):2100-3. PubMed ID: 4308666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical-legal guide--principles for cooperation. The Connecticut State Medical Society and The Connecticut Bar Association.
Conn Med; 1969 May; 33(5):326-8. PubMed ID: 5770273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Physicians and attorneys working together: forensic medicine and the letter opinion.
Lyons ED
Del Med J; 1994 May; 66(5):287-8. PubMed ID: 8039590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Forensic-medical expertise in civil court].
Pashinian GA; Ivshin IV; Popova TG
Sud Med Ekspert; 2008; 51(2):31-3. PubMed ID: 18450098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Ethical issues in forensic psychiatry: from an attorney's perspective.
Weiner BA
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):253-61. PubMed ID: 6478068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Medico-legal opinionating and its importance in the light of legal requirements].
Głazek A
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2007; 57(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 17691172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Practical ethical problems of the forensic psychiatrist in dealing with attorneys.
Sadoff RL
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):243-52. PubMed ID: 6478067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Co-operation of stationary and ambulatory establishments in the improvement of quality of medical expert testimony].
Kollmorgen G
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1974 Apr; 68(8):386-9. PubMed ID: 4277789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Guidelines on attorney and physician relationships.
IMJ Ill Med J; 1985 May; 167(5):358-61. PubMed ID: 2861178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Can you be forced to testify against a colleague?
Rice B
Med Econ; 2004 Sep; 81(17):28-30. PubMed ID: 15481619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [The physician as the expert in civil legal suits].
Weimar W
Ther Ggw; 1981 Aug; 120(8):748-52. PubMed ID: 7292360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Interprofessional code. Indiana State Medical Association--Indiana State Bar Association.
J Indiana State Med Assoc; 1974 Feb; 67(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 4812472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Representing your patients: the deposition.
Waldman S
Tex Med; 1988 Jun; 84(6):35-41. PubMed ID: 3394112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
