These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23751256)

  • 1. Timeout from a high-force requirement as a reinforcer: an effective procedure for human operant research.
    Alessandri J; Rivière V
    Behav Processes; 2013 Oct; 99():1-6. PubMed ID: 23751256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human performance on a two-alternative rapid-acquisition choice task.
    Lie C; Harper DN; Hunt M
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 19015013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of reinforcer choice measured in single-operant and concurrent-schedule procedures.
    Geckeler AS; Libby ME; Graff RB; Ahearn WH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000; 33(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 11051580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Human choice under schedules of negative reinforcement.
    Alessandri J; Cançado CR
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():70-3. PubMed ID: 26518610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Operant variability and voluntary action.
    Neuringer A; Jensen G
    Psychol Rev; 2010 Jul; 117(3):972-93. PubMed ID: 20658860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responding during reinforcement delay in a self-control paradigm.
    Logue AW; Peña-Correal TE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 May; 41(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 6736857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling the dynamics of choice.
    Baum WM; Davison M
    Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 19429211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Humans' choice in a self-control choice situation: sensitivity to reinforcer amount, reinforcer delay, and overall reinforcement density.
    Ito M; Nakamura K
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Jan; 69(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 9465415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magazine approach during a signal for food depends on Pavlovian, not instrumental, conditioning.
    Harris JA; Andrew BJ; Kwok DW
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Apr; 39(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 23421397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of delayed reinforcers on the behavior of an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Johansen EB; Sagvolden T; Kvande G
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 162(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 15922066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of lesions of the nucleus accumbens core on inter-temporal choice: further observations with an adjusting-delay procedure.
    da Costa Araújo S; Body S; Hampson CL; Langley RW; Deakin JF; Anderson IM; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
    Behav Brain Res; 2009 Sep; 202(2):272-7. PubMed ID: 19463712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behavioral control by the response-reinforcer correlation.
    Kuroda T; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Sep; 110(2):185-200. PubMed ID: 30073649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unblocking in Pavlovian appetitive conditioning.
    Holland PC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1984 Oct; 10(4):476-97. PubMed ID: 6491608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of timeout on a discrimination between fixed-ratio schedules.
    Rilling M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 Mar; 11(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 5645868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nucleus accumbens neurons in the rat exhibit differential activity to conditioned reinforcers and primary reinforcers within a second-order schedule of saccharin reinforcement.
    Wilson DI; Bowman EM
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 20(10):2777-88. PubMed ID: 15548221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-control in adult humans: variation in positive reinforcer amount and delay.
    Logue AW; Peña-Correal TE; Rodriguez ML; Kabela E
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Sep; 46(2):159-73. PubMed ID: 3760749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A conditioned reinforcer did not help to maintain an operant conditioning in the absence of a primary reinforcer in horses.
    Lansade L; Calandreau L
    Behav Processes; 2018 Jan; 146():61-63. PubMed ID: 29158027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing preference and reinforcer effectiveness in dogs.
    Vicars SM; Miguel CF; Sobie JL
    Behav Processes; 2014 Mar; 103():75-83. PubMed ID: 24270051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Behavioral effects of intra-cranial self-stimulation in an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
    Johansen EB; Sagvolden T
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 162(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 15922065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive impulsivity in animal models: role of response time and reinforcing rate in delay intolerance with two-choice operant tasks.
    Adriani W; Zoratto F; Romano E; Laviola G
    Neuropharmacology; 2010; 58(4-5):694-701. PubMed ID: 19945469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.