57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23752000)
1. What have we gained by performing robotic rectal resection? Evaluation of 64 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma.
Erguner I; Aytac E; Boler DE; Atalar B; Baca B; Karahasanoglu T; Hamzaoglu I; Uras C
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2013 Jun; 23(3):316-9. PubMed ID: 23752000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of a robotic surgery program for rectal cancer: short- and long-term results from a comparative, retrospective study between two laparoscopic and robotic reference centers.
Rogier-Mouzelas F; Piquard A; Karam E; Dussart D; Michot N; Saint-Marc O; Thebault B; Artus A; Bucur P; Pabst-Giger U; Salame E; Ouaissi M
Surg Endosc; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38789622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol.
Randell R; Greenhalgh J; Hindmarsh J; Dowding D; Jayne D; Pearman A; Gardner P; Croft J; Kotze A
Implement Sci; 2014 May; 9():52. PubMed ID: 24885669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.
Park EJ; Cho MS; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg; 2015 Jan; 261(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 24662411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopic versus robotic rectal resection for rectal cancer in a veteran population.
Fernandez R; Anaya DA; Li LT; Orcutt ST; Balentine CJ; Awad SA; Berger DH; Albo DA; Artinyan A
Am J Surg; 2013 Oct; 206(4):509-17. PubMed ID: 23809672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Non-Oncological Postoperative Outcomes Following Robotic and Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection for Colorectal Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Ravindra C; Igweonu-Nwakile EO; Ali S; Paul S; Yakkali S; Teresa Selvin S; Thomas S; Bikeyeva V; Abdullah A; Radivojevic A; Abu Jad AA; Ravanavena A; Balani P
Cureus; 2022 Jul; 14(7):e27015. PubMed ID: 35989760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Difference in surgical outcomes of rectal cancer by study design: meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials, case-matched studies, and cohort studies.
Hoshino N; Sakamoto T; Hida K; Takahashi Y; Okada H; Obama K; Nakayama T
BJS Open; 2021 Mar; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 33724337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.
Ng KT; Tsia AKV; Chong VYL
World J Surg; 2019 Apr; 43(4):1146-1161. PubMed ID: 30610272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Totally robotic complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer.
Ozben V; Aytac E; Atasoy D; Erenler Bayraktar I; Bayraktar O; Sapci I; Baca B; Karahasanoglu T; Hamzaoglu I
J Robot Surg; 2019 Feb; 13(1):107-114. PubMed ID: 29774501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transanal Endoscopic and Transabdominal Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid-to-Low Rectal Cancer: Comparison of Short-term Postoperative and Oncologic Outcomes by Using a Case-Matched Analysis.
Lee KY; Shin JK; Park YA; Yun SH; Huh JW; Cho YB; Kim HC; Lee WY
Ann Coloproctol; 2018 Feb; 34(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 29535985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic operation in anus-preserving rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Cui Y; Li C; Xu Z; Wang Y; Sun Y; Xu H; Li Z; Sun Y
Ther Clin Risk Manag; 2017; 13():1247-1257. PubMed ID: 29026312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a comparative study of clinical outcomes and costs.
Ielpo B; Duran H; Diaz E; Fabra I; Caruso R; Malavé L; Ferri V; Nuñez J; Ruiz-Ocaña A; Jorge E; Lazzaro S; Kalivaci D; Quijano Y; Vicente E
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Oct; 32(10):1423-1429. PubMed ID: 28791457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Critical analysis of the literature investigating urogenital function preservation following robotic rectal cancer surgery.
Panteleimonitis S; Ahmed J; Harper M; Parvaiz A
World J Gastrointest Surg; 2016 Nov; 8(11):744-754. PubMed ID: 27933136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic rectal surgery: State of the art.
Staderini F; Foppa C; Minuzzo A; Badii B; Qirici E; Trallori G; Mallardi B; Lami G; Macrì G; Bonanomi A; Bagnoli S; Perigli G; Cianchi F
World J Gastrointest Oncol; 2016 Nov; 8(11):757-771. PubMed ID: 27895814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Overview of robotic colorectal surgery: Current and future practical developments.
Roy S; Evans C
World J Gastrointest Surg; 2016 Feb; 8(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 26981188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Sun Y; Xu H; Li Z; Han J; Song W; Wang J; Xu Z
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 14():61. PubMed ID: 26928124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lee SH; Lim S; Kim JH; Lee KY
Ann Surg Treat Res; 2015 Oct; 89(4):190-201. PubMed ID: 26448918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted colectomy and rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lorenzon L; Bini F; Balducci G; Ferri M; Salvi PF; Marinozzi F
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2016 Feb; 31(2):161-73. PubMed ID: 26410261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review of current practice.
Mak TW; Lee JF; Futaba K; Hon SS; Ngo DK; Ng SS
World J Gastrointest Oncol; 2014 Jun; 6(6):184-93. PubMed ID: 24936229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: what is the evidence?
Chan DK; Chong CS; Lieske B; Tan KK
Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():347810. PubMed ID: 24822196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
