These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23752709)

  • 21. Gene patenting--is the pendulum swinging back?
    Kesselheim AS; Mello MM
    N Engl J Med; 2010 May; 362(20):1855-8. PubMed ID: 20375396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A victory for genes.
    Nat Med; 2013 Jul; 19(7):792. PubMed ID: 23836200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patents and laboratory medicine: what is required to turn an unpatentable natural phenomenon or law of nature into a patentable invention?
    Powlick JT
    Clin Chem; 2012 Aug; 58(8):1205-7. PubMed ID: 22504119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Are human genes patentable? The Supreme Court says yes and no.
    Golden JM; Sage WM
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Aug; 32(8):1343-5. PubMed ID: 23918476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Patents. U.S. Supreme Court delves into what is and isn't patentable.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5933):1374. PubMed ID: 19520926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Supreme Court to Myriad Genetics: Synthetic DNA is Patentable but Isolated Genes Are Not.
    Weinmeyer R; Klusty T
    AMA J Ethics; 2015 Sep; 17(9):849-53. PubMed ID: 26390207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Myriad case heads back to Court of Appeals: Supreme Court remands case after Prometheus decision.
    Am J Med Genet A; 2012 Jul; 158A(7):xi. PubMed ID: 22711654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. AMP v Myriad: the Supreme Court gives a win to personalized medicine.
    Klein RD
    J Mol Diagn; 2013 Nov; 15(6):731-2. PubMed ID: 24139185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Legal battle over BRCA1 and BRCA2 patents continues.
    Levenson D
    Am J Med Genet A; 2011 Nov; 155A(11):x-xi. PubMed ID: 22021229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. US court sparks debate on cancer gene patents.
    Furlow B
    Lancet Oncol; 2010 May; 11(5):416. PubMed ID: 20449871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Patents. U.S. appeals court hears gene patent arguments.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2012 Jul; 337(6092):277-8. PubMed ID: 22822118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patentable subject matter, TRIPS and the European Biotechnology Directive: Australia and patenting human genes.
    Palombi L
    Univ N S W Law J; 2003; 26(3):782-92. PubMed ID: 16617532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intellectual Property in Genetic Material.
    Gatley I
    J Bioeth Inq; 2015 Dec; 12(4):561-4. PubMed ID: 26691916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prometheus and Bilski: pushing the bounds of patentable subject matter in medical diagnostic techniques with the machine-or-transformation test.
    Pessagno S
    Am J Law Med; 2010; 36(4):619-51. PubMed ID: 21302848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Supreme Court rules life forms patentable.
    Chem Eng News; 1980 Jun; 58(25):10. PubMed ID: 11662744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Patents. Cancer gene patents ruled invalid.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5975):153. PubMed ID: 20378781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The future of gene patents and the implications for medicine.
    Sherkow JS; Greely HT
    JAMA Intern Med; 2013 Sep; 173(17):1569-70. PubMed ID: 23896757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The
    Sherkow JS; Cook-Deegan R; Greely HT
    Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2024 Aug; 25(1):397-419. PubMed ID: 38424474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Department of Justice opposes patents on isolated genes.
    Levenson D
    Am J Med Genet A; 2011 Feb; 155A(2):vii-viii. PubMed ID: 21271638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Patent law--patent on life form--man-made modification of microorganism is patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101--Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 100 S.Ct. 2204 (1980).
    Vidas S
    Hamline Law Rev; 1981 Jan; 4(2):341-50. PubMed ID: 11650724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.