713 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23753843)
1. Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012).
Feldman DN; Swaminathan RV; Kaltenbach LA; Baklanov DV; Kim LK; Wong SC; Minutello RM; Messenger JC; Moussa I; Garratt KN; Piana RN; Hillegass WB; Cohen MG; Gilchrist IC; Rao SV
Circulation; 2013 Jun; 127(23):2295-306. PubMed ID: 23753843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.
Rao SV; Ou FS; Wang TY; Roe MT; Brindis R; Rumsfeld JS; Peterson ED
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Aug; 1(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 19463333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies.
Roule V; Lemaitre A; Sabatier R; Lognoné T; Dahdouh Z; Berger L; Milliez P; Grollier G; Montalescot G; Beygui F
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2015 Nov; 108(11):563-75. PubMed ID: 26365478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A registry-based randomized trial comparing radial and femoral approaches in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SAFE-PCI for Women (Study of Access Site for Enhancement of PCI for Women) trial.
Rao SV; Hess CN; Barham B; Aberle LH; Anstrom KJ; Patel TB; Jorgensen JP; Mazzaferri EL; Jolly SS; Jacobs A; Newby LK; Gibson CM; Kong DF; Mehran R; Waksman R; Gilchrist IC; McCourt BJ; Messenger JC; Peterson ED; Harrington RA; Krucoff MW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(8):857-67. PubMed ID: 25147030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of access site choice on incidence of neurologic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Ratib K; Mamas MA; Routledge HC; Ludman PF; Fraser D; Nolan J
Am Heart J; 2013 Mar; 165(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 23453099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use and outcome of radial versus femoral approach for primary PCI in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction without cardiogenic shock: results from the ALKK PCI registry.
Bauer T; Hochadel M; Brachmann J; Schächinger V; Boekstegers P; Zrenner B; Zahn R; Zeymer U;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Oct; 86 Suppl 1():S8-14. PubMed ID: 25945803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndromes: re-evaluation of the current body of evidence.
Lee MS; Wolfe M; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1149-52. PubMed ID: 24262614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.
Abdelaal E; Brousseau-Provencher C; Montminy S; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Bataille Y; Molin P; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Roy L; Larose É; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Proulx G; Costerousse O; Bertrand OF;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1129-37. PubMed ID: 24139933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radial versus femoral approach comparison in percutaneous coronary intervention with intraaortic balloon pump support: the RADIAL PUMP UP registry.
Romagnoli E; De Vita M; Burzotta F; Cortese B; Biondi-Zoccai G; Summaria F; Patrizi R; Lanzillo C; Lucci V; Cavazza C; Tarantino F; Sangiorgi GM; Lioy E; Crea F; Rao SV; Trani C
Am Heart J; 2013 Dec; 166(6):1019-26. PubMed ID: 24268216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A contemporary view of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: a report from the CathPCI Registry of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2010 through June 2011.
Dehmer GJ; Weaver D; Roe MT; Milford-Beland S; Fitzgerald S; Hermann A; Messenger J; Moussa I; Garratt K; Rumsfeld J; Brindis RG
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Nov; 60(20):2017-31. PubMed ID: 23083784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events.
Dangoisse V; Guédès A; Gabriel L; Jamart J; Chenu P; Marchandise B; Schroeder E
EuroIntervention; 2013 Jul; 9(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23872649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adoption of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention and outcomes according to center radial volume in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare system: insights from the Veterans Affairs clinical assessment, reporting, and tracking (CART) program.
Gutierrez A; Tsai TT; Stanislawski MA; Vidovich M; Bryson CL; Bhatt DL; Grunwald GK; Rumsfeld J; Rao SV
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(4):336-46. PubMed ID: 23941860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transradial versus transfemoral coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: is transradial coronary intervention suitable for emergency PCI in high-risk acute myocardial infarction?
Iga A; Wagatsuma K; Yamazaki J; Ikeda T
J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 May; 26(5):196-202. PubMed ID: 24791717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience.
Rodriguez-Leor O; Fernandez-Nofrerias E; Carrillo X; Mauri J; Oliete C; Rivas Mdel C; Bayes-Genis A
Am Heart J; 2013 Mar; 165(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 23453093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access in Patients Undergoing Rescue Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Fibrinolytic Therapy.
Kadakia MB; Rao SV; McCoy L; Choudhuri PS; Sherwood MW; Lilly S; Kobayashi T; Kolansky DM; Wilensky RL; Yeh RW; Giri J
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Dec; 8(14):1868-76. PubMed ID: 26718516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decreased complication rates using the transradial compared to the transfemoral approach in percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of routine stenting and glycoprotein platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitor use: a large single-center experience.
Eichhöfer J; Horlick E; Ivanov J; Seidelin PH; Ross JR; Ing D; Daly P; Mackie K; Ridley B; Schwartz L; Barolet A; Dzavík V
Am Heart J; 2008 Nov; 156(5):864-70. PubMed ID: 19061699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of 3-year clinical outcomes after transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention.
Natsuaki M; Morimoto T; Furukawa Y; Nakagawa Y; Kadota K; Iwabuchi M; Shizuta S; Shiomi H; Kimura T
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2012 May; 27(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 22623001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transradial approach in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with abciximab results in fewer bleeding complications: data from EUROTRANSFER registry.
Siudak Z; Zawislak B; Dziewierz A; Rakowski T; Jakala J; Bartus S; Noworolnik B; Zasada W; Dubiel JS; Dudek D
Coron Artery Dis; 2010 Aug; 21(5):292-7. PubMed ID: 20453640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility limits of transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction in the real life (TRAP-AMI).
Gellen B; Lesault PF; Canouï-Poitrine F; Champagne S; Mouillet G; Pongas D; Le Thuaut A; Jakljevic T; Boudiche S; de la Vega M; Maalej A; Veugeois A; Dubois-Randé JL; Teiger E
Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 168(2):1056-61. PubMed ID: 23159410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effectiveness of the transradial approach to reduce bleedings in patients undergoing urgent coronary angioplasty with GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors for acute coronary syndromes.
De Carlo M; Borelli G; Gistri R; Ciabatti N; Mazzoni A; Arena M; Petronio AS
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Sep; 74(3):408-15. PubMed ID: 19360863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
