608 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23755873)
1. Reproducibility of a long-range swept-source optical coherence tomography ocular biometry system and comparison with clinical biometers.
Grulkowski I; Liu JJ; Zhang JY; Potsaid B; Jayaraman V; Cable AE; Duker JS; Fujimoto JG
Ophthalmology; 2013 Nov; 120(11):2184-90. PubMed ID: 23755873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster.
Huang J; Savini G; Hoffer KJ; Chen H; Lu W; Hu Q; Bao F; Wang Q
Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):493-498. PubMed ID: 27503393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer.
Shammas HJ; Ortiz S; Shammas MC; Kim SH; Chong C
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 26948778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry.
Kunert KS; Peter M; Blum M; Haigis W; Sekundo W; Schütze J; Büehren T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26948781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Split-Window OCT biometry in pseudophakic eyes.
Sikorski BL; Hoffer KJ
Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 100(8):e1685-e1690. PubMed ID: 35670319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agreement between 2 swept-source OCT biometers and a Scheimpflug partial coherence interferometer.
Tañá-Rivero P; Aguilar-Córcoles S; Tello-Elordi C; Pastor-Pascual F; Montés-Micó R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Apr; 47(4):488-495. PubMed ID: 33252569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Agreement between intraoperative anterior segment spectral-domain OCT and 2 swept-source OCT biometers.
Tañá-Sanz P; Ruiz-Santos M; Rodríguez-Carrillo MD; Aguilar-Córcoles S; Montés-Micó R; Tañá-Rivero P
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2021 Apr; 18(4):387-393. PubMed ID: 33730515
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comprehensive Comparison of Axial Length Measurement With Three Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometers and Partial Coherence Interferometry.
Huang J; Chen H; Li Y; Chen Z; Gao R; Yu J; Zhao Y; Lu W; McAlinden C; Wang Q
J Refract Surg; 2019 Feb; 35(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 30742226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability of 2 swept-source OCT biometers and 1 optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
Fişuş AD; Hirnschall ND; Ruiss M; Pilwachs C; Georgiev S; Findl O
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1302-1307. PubMed ID: 33770018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of ocular biometric measurements in patients with cataract using three swept-source optical coherence tomography devices.
Oh R; Oh JY; Choi HJ; Kim MK; Yoon CH
BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):62. PubMed ID: 33504333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ocular biometry in dense cataracts: Comparison of partial-coherence interferometry, swept-source optical coherence tomography and immersion ultrasound.
González-Godínez S; Saucedo-Urdapilleta R; Mayorquín-Ruiz M; Velasco-Barona C; Moragrega-Adame E; Domínguez-Varela IA; Gonzalez-Salinas R
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan; 70(1):107-111. PubMed ID: 34937218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Refractive prediction of four different intraocular lens calculation formulas compared between new swept source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry.
Song MY; Noh SR; Kim KY
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251152. PubMed ID: 33945581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry.
Hoffer KJ; Hoffmann PC; Savini G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1165-72. PubMed ID: 27531293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 2 modern swept-source optical biometers-IOLMaster 700 and Anterion.
Langenbucher A; Szentmáry N; Cayless A; Wendelstein J; Hoffmann P
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 Apr; 261(4):999-1010. PubMed ID: 36307658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeatability of new optical biometer and agreement with 2 validated optical biometers, all based on SS-OCT.
Galzignato A; Lupardi E; Hoffer KJ; Barboni P; Schiano-Lomoriello D; Savini G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 Jan; 49(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 36026703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometry devices.
Fişuş AD; Hirnschall ND; Findl O
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Jan; 47(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 32769752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repeatability and reproducibility of optical biometry implemented in a new optical coherence tomographer and comparison with a optical low-coherence reflectometer.
Kanclerz P; Hoffer KJ; Rozema JJ; Przewłócka K; Savini G
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1619-1624. PubMed ID: 31706516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.
Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P; Loket S
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer.
Yang CM; Lim DH; Kim HJ; Chung TY
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223114. PubMed ID: 31603903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficiency and measurements agreement between swept-source OCT and low-coherence interferometry biometry systems.
Calvo-Sanz JA; Portero-Benito A; Arias-Puente A
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 256(3):559-566. PubMed ID: 29392397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
