414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23756626)
1. Molecular subtyping of early-stage breast cancer identifies a group of patients who do not benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Glück S; de Snoo F; Peeters J; Stork-Sloots L; Somlo G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jun; 139(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 23756626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of molecular subtyping with BluePrint, MammaPrint, and TargetPrint to local clinical subtyping in breast cancer patients.
Nguyen B; Cusumano PG; Deck K; Kerlin D; Garcia AA; Barone JL; Rivera E; Yao K; de Snoo FA; van den Akker J; Stork-Sloots L; Generali D
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):3257-63. PubMed ID: 22965266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chemosensitivity and Endocrine Sensitivity in Clinical Luminal Breast Cancer Patients in the Prospective Neoadjuvant Breast Registry Symphony Trial (NBRST) Predicted by Molecular Subtyping.
Whitworth P; Beitsch P; Mislowsky A; Pellicane JV; Nash C; Murray M; Lee LA; Dul CL; Rotkis M; Baron P; Stork-Sloots L; de Snoo FA; Beatty J
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):669-675. PubMed ID: 27770345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chemosensitivity predicted by BluePrint 80-gene functional subtype and MammaPrint in the Prospective Neoadjuvant Breast Registry Symphony Trial (NBRST).
Whitworth P; Stork-Sloots L; de Snoo FA; Richards P; Rotkis M; Beatty J; Mislowsky A; Pellicane JV; Nguyen B; Lee L; Nash C; Gittleman M; Akbari S; Beitsch PD
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):3261-7. PubMed ID: 25099655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Different prognostic significance of Ki-67 change between pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various subtypes of breast cancer.
Matsubara N; Mukai H; Fujii S; Wada N
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jan; 137(1):203-12. PubMed ID: 23184081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concordance of clinical and molecular breast cancer subtyping in the context of preoperative chemotherapy response.
de Ronde JJ; Hannemann J; Halfwerk H; Mulder L; Straver ME; Vrancken Peeters MJ; Wesseling J; van de Vijver M; Wessels LF; Rodenhuis S
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jan; 119(1):119-26. PubMed ID: 19669409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes.
Carey LA; Dees EC; Sawyer L; Gatti L; Moore DT; Collichio F; Ollila DW; Sartor CI; Graham ML; Perou CM
Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Apr; 13(8):2329-34. PubMed ID: 17438091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Molecular class as a predictor of locoregional and distant recurrence in the neoadjuvant setting for breast cancer.
Vargo JA; Beriwal S; Ahrendt GM; Soran A; Johnson RR; McGuire K; Bhargava R
Oncology; 2011; 80(5-6):341-9. PubMed ID: 21791944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Triple-negative phenotype is of adverse prognostic value in patients treated with dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy: a translational research analysis in the context of a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) randomized phase III trial.
Skarlos P; Christodoulou C; Kalogeras KT; Eleftheraki AG; Bobos M; Batistatou A; Valavanis C; Tzaida O; Timotheadou E; Kronenwett R; Wirtz RM; Kostopoulos I; Televantou D; Koutselini E; Papaspirou I; Papadimitriou CA; Pectasides D; Gogas H; Aravantinos G; Pavlidis N; Arapantoni P; Skarlos DV; Fountzilas G
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2012 Feb; 69(2):533-46. PubMed ID: 21901395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Molecular subtyping predicts pathologic tumor response in early-stage breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel plus capecitabine with or without trastuzumab chemotherapy.
Bayraktar S; Royce M; Stork-Sloots L; de Snoo F; Glück S
Med Oncol; 2014 Oct; 31(10):163. PubMed ID: 25186065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immunohistochemical surrogate markers of breast cancer molecular classes predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a single institutional experience with 359 cases.
Bhargava R; Beriwal S; Dabbs DJ; Ozbek U; Soran A; Johnson RR; Brufsky AM; Lembersky BC; Ahrendt GM
Cancer; 2010 Mar; 116(6):1431-9. PubMed ID: 20131351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of Tumor Size on Probability of Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Baron P; Beitsch P; Boselli D; Symanowski J; Pellicane JV; Beatty J; Richards P; Mislowsky A; Nash C; Lee LA; Murray M; de Snoo FA; Stork-Sloots L; Gittleman M; Akbari S; Whitworth P
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 23(5):1522-9. PubMed ID: 26714960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer: tumor markers as predictors of pathologic response, recurrence, and survival.
Precht LM; Lowe KA; Atwood M; Beatty JD
Breast J; 2010; 16(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 20443786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes.
von Minckwitz G; Untch M; Blohmer JU; Costa SD; Eidtmann H; Fasching PA; Gerber B; Eiermann W; Hilfrich J; Huober J; Jackisch C; Kaufmann M; Konecny GE; Denkert C; Nekljudova V; Mehta K; Loibl S
J Clin Oncol; 2012 May; 30(15):1796-804. PubMed ID: 22508812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differential response of triple-negative breast cancer to a docetaxel and carboplatin-based neoadjuvant treatment.
Chang HR; Glaspy J; Allison MA; Kass FC; Elashoff R; Chung DU; Gornbein J
Cancer; 2010 Sep; 116(18):4227-37. PubMed ID: 20549829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ HER2- breast cancer: response prediction based on immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics.
Lips EH; Mulder L; de Ronde JJ; Mandjes IA; Vincent A; Vrancken Peeters MT; Nederlof PM; Wesseling J; Rodenhuis S
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Feb; 131(3):827-36. PubMed ID: 21472434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Immunohistochemical versus molecular (BluePrint and MammaPrint) subtyping of breast carcinoma. Outcome results from the EORTC 10041/BIG 3-04 MINDACT trial.
Viale G; de Snoo FA; Slaets L; Bogaerts J; van 't Veer L; Rutgers EJ; Piccart-Gebhart MJ; Stork-Sloots L; Glas A; Russo L; Dell'Orto P; Tryfonidis K; Litière S; Cardoso F;
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 167(1):123-131. PubMed ID: 28929359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selecting the neoadjuvant treatment by molecular subtype: how to maximize the benefit?
von Minckwitz G; Fontanella C
Breast; 2013 Aug; 22 Suppl 2():S149-51. PubMed ID: 24074777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic value of circulating tumor cells according to immunohistochemically defined molecular subtypes in advanced breast cancer.
Munzone E; Botteri E; Sandri MT; Esposito A; Adamoli L; Zorzino L; Sciandivasci A; Cassatella MC; Rotmensz N; Aurilio G; Curigliano G; Goldhirsch A; Nolè F
Clin Breast Cancer; 2012 Oct; 12(5):340-6. PubMed ID: 23040002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Treatment response and 5-year distant metastasis-free survival outcome in breast cancer patients after the use of MammaPrint and BluePrint to guide preoperative systemic treatment decisions.
Göker E; Hendriks MP; van Tilburg M; Barcaru A; Mittempergher L; van Egmond A; Kleijn M; Generali D;
Eur J Cancer; 2022 May; 167():92-102. PubMed ID: 35421703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
