BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23756895)

  • 1. Implementing a QTL detection study (GWAS) using genomic prediction methodology.
    Garrick DJ; Fernando RL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():275-98. PubMed ID: 23756895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genome-wide association analysis and genetic architecture of egg weight and egg uniformity in layer chickens.
    Wolc A; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Preisinger R; Habier D; Fernando R; Garrick DJ; Hill WG; Dekkers JC
    Anim Genet; 2012 Jul; 43 Suppl 1():87-96. PubMed ID: 22742506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
    Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A genome scan for quantitative trait loci influencing carcass, post-natal growth and reproductive traits in commercial Angus cattle.
    McClure MC; Morsci NS; Schnabel RD; Kim JW; Yao P; Rolf MM; McKay SD; Gregg SJ; Chapple RH; Northcutt SL; Taylor JF
    Anim Genet; 2010 Dec; 41(6):597-607. PubMed ID: 20477797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of ancestral haplotypes in genome-wide association studies.
    Druet T; Farnir F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():347-80. PubMed ID: 23756899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Designing a GWAS: power, sample size, and data structure.
    Ball RD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():37-98. PubMed ID: 23756887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of methods for whole-genome QTL mapping using dense markers in four livestock species.
    Legarra A; Croiseau P; Sanchez MP; Teyssèdre S; Sallé G; Allais S; Fritz S; Moreno CR; Ricard A; Elsen JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):6. PubMed ID: 25885597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical analysis of genomic data.
    Ball RD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():171-92. PubMed ID: 23756891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Components of the accuracy of genomic prediction in a multi-breed sheep population.
    Daetwyler HD; Kemper KE; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3375-84. PubMed ID: 23038744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensitivity to prior specification in Bayesian genome-based prediction models.
    Lehermeier C; Wimmer V; Albrecht T; Auinger HJ; Gianola D; Schmid VJ; Schön CC
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2013 Jun; 12(3):375-91. PubMed ID: 23629460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian composite model space approach for mapping quantitative trait Loci in variance component model.
    Fang M; Liu S; Jiang D
    Behav Genet; 2009 May; 39(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 19263210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian methods applied to GWAS.
    Fernando RL; Garrick D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():237-74. PubMed ID: 23756894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the value of phenotypic information from non-genotyped animals for QTL mapping of complex traits in real and simulated populations.
    Melo TP; Takada L; Baldi F; Oliveira HN; Dias MM; Neves HH; Schenkel FS; Albuquerque LG; Carvalheiro R
    BMC Genet; 2016 Jun; 17(1):89. PubMed ID: 27328759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genome-wide associations for fertility traits in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows using data from experimental research herds in four European countries.
    Berry DP; Bastiaansen JW; Veerkamp RF; Wijga S; Wall E; Berglund B; Calus MP
    Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1206-15. PubMed ID: 23217223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) results.
    Henshall JM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():411-21. PubMed ID: 23756902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relevance of genetic relationship in GWAS and genomic prediction.
    Pereira HD; Soriano Viana JM; Andrade ACB; Fonseca E Silva F; Paes GP
    J Appl Genet; 2018 Feb; 59(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 29190011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current progress on statistical methods for mapping quantitative trait loci from inbred line crosses.
    Da Costa e Silva L; Zeng ZB
    J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Mar; 20(2):454-81. PubMed ID: 20309768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic selection and complex trait prediction using a fast EM algorithm applied to genome-wide markers.
    Shepherd RK; Meuwissen TH; Woolliams JA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Oct; 11():529. PubMed ID: 20969788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative analysis of the GBLUP, emBayesB, and GWAS algorithms to predict genetic values in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea).
    Dong L; Xiao S; Wang Q; Wang Z
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jun; 17():460. PubMed ID: 27301965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genome-wide association mapping including phenotypes from relatives without genotypes.
    Wang H; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Muir WM
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Apr; 94(2):73-83. PubMed ID: 22624567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.