233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23756897)
1. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (gBLUP) for the estimation of genomic breeding values.
Clark SA; van der Werf J
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():321-30. PubMed ID: 23756897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An efficient exact method to obtain GBLUP and single-step GBLUP when the genomic relationship matrix is singular.
Fernando RL; Cheng H; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Oct; 48(1):80. PubMed ID: 27788669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficient approximation of reliabilities for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor models with the Algorithm for Proven and Young.
Bermann M; Lourenco D; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2022 Jan; 100(1):. PubMed ID: 34877603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle using a simple heritable genetic ground.
Pribyl J; Rehout V; Citek J; Pribylova J
J Sci Food Agric; 2010 Aug; 90(11):1765-73. PubMed ID: 20564310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Best linear unbiased prediction of genomic breeding values using a trait-specific marker-derived relationship matrix.
Zhang Z; Liu J; Ding X; Bijma P; de Koning DJ; Zhang Q
PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):. PubMed ID: 20844593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes.
Clark SA; Hickey JM; Daetwyler HD; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Feb; 44(1):4. PubMed ID: 22321529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method reflecting the degree of linkage disequilibrium.
Nishio M; Satoh M
J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Oct; 132(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 25866073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracies of direct genomic breeding values in Hereford beef cattle using national or international training populations.
Saatchi M; Ward J; Garrick DJ
J Anim Sci; 2013 Apr; 91(4):1538-51. PubMed ID: 23345550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation.
Clark SA; Hickey JM; van der Werf JH
Genet Sel Evol; 2011 May; 43(1):18. PubMed ID: 21575265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomic Model with Correlation Between Additive and Dominance Effects.
Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
Genetics; 2018 Jul; 209(3):711-723. PubMed ID: 29743175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bias in genomic predictions for populations under selection.
Vitezica ZG; Aguilar I; Misztal I; Legarra A
Genet Res (Camb); 2011 Oct; 93(5):357-66. PubMed ID: 21767459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers.
Heidaritabar M; Wolc A; Arango J; Zeng J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Bastiaansen JW; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):334-46. PubMed ID: 27357473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of model specifications on the reliabilities of genomic prediction in a Swedish-Finnish red breed cattle population.
Rius-Vilarrasa E; Brøndum RF; Strandén I; Guldbrandtsen B; Strandberg E; Lund MS; Fikse WF
J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Oct; 129(5):369-79. PubMed ID: 22963358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Metafounders are related to F
Garcia-Baccino CA; Legarra A; Christensen OF; Misztal I; Pocrnic I; Vitezica ZG; Cantet RJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Mar; 49(1):34. PubMed ID: 28283016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting genetic values: a kernel-based best linear unbiased prediction with genomic data.
Ober U; Erbe M; Long N; Porcu E; Schlather M; Simianer H
Genetics; 2011 Jul; 188(3):695-708. PubMed ID: 21515573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between genomic predictions using daughter yield deviation and conventional estimated breeding value as response variables.
Guo G; Lund MS; Zhang Y; Su G
J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Dec; 127(6):423-32. PubMed ID: 21077966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of whole-genome prediction using a genetic architecture-enhanced variance-covariance matrix.
Zhang Z; Erbe M; He J; Ober U; Gao N; Zhang H; Simianer H; Li J
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Feb; 5(4):615-27. PubMed ID: 25670771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of methods for the implementation of genome-assisted evaluation of Spanish dairy cattle.
Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):625-34. PubMed ID: 23102955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
