These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23756901)

  • 1. Genotype imputation to increase sample size in pedigreed populations.
    Hickey JM; Cleveland MA; Maltecca C; Gorjanc G; Gredler B; Kranis A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():395-410. PubMed ID: 23756901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genotype phasing in populations of closely related individuals.
    Hickey JM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():381-94. PubMed ID: 23756900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A phasing and imputation method for pedigreed populations that results in a single-stage genomic evaluation.
    Hickey JM; Kinghorn BP; Tier B; van der Werf JH; Cleveland MA
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jun; 44(1):9. PubMed ID: 22462519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A hybrid method for the imputation of genomic data in livestock populations.
    Antolín R; Nettelblad C; Gorjanc G; Money D; Hickey JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Mar; 49(1):30. PubMed ID: 28253858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of different methods for imputing genome-wide marker genotypes in Swedish and Finnish Red Cattle.
    Ma P; Brøndum RF; Zhang Q; Lund MS; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jul; 96(7):4666-77. PubMed ID: 23684022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A combined long-range phasing and long haplotype imputation method to impute phase for SNP genotypes.
    Hickey JM; Kinghorn BP; Tier B; Wilson JF; Dunstan N; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Mar; 43(1):12. PubMed ID: 21388557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Whole-genome characterization in pedigreed non-human primates using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) and imputation.
    Bimber BN; Raboin MJ; Letaw J; Nevonen KA; Spindel JE; McCouch SR; Cervera-Juanes R; Spindel E; Carbone L; Ferguson B; Vinson A
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):676. PubMed ID: 27558348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fast imputation using medium or low-coverage sequence data.
    VanRaden PM; Sun C; O'Connell JR
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():82. PubMed ID: 26168789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extending long-range phasing and haplotype library imputation methods to impute genotypes on sex chromosomes.
    Hickey JM; Kranis A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Apr; 45(1):10. PubMed ID: 23617460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
    Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Imputation of genotypes with low-density chips and its effect on reliability of direct genomic values in Dutch Holstein cattle.
    Mulder HA; Calus MP; Druet T; Schrooten C
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):876-89. PubMed ID: 22281352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hybrid peeling for fast and accurate calling, phasing, and imputation with sequence data of any coverage in pedigrees.
    Whalen A; Ros-Freixedes R; Wilson DL; Gorjanc G; Hickey JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):67. PubMed ID: 30563452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of ancestral haplotypes in genome-wide association studies.
    Druet T; Farnir F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():347-80. PubMed ID: 23756899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Missing data imputation and haplotype phase inference for genome-wide association studies.
    Browning SR
    Hum Genet; 2008 Dec; 124(5):439-50. PubMed ID: 18850115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A spatial haplotype copying model with applications to genotype imputation.
    Yang WY; Hormozdiari F; Eskin E; Pasaniuc B
    J Comput Biol; 2015 May; 22(5):451-62. PubMed ID: 25526526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imputation of non-genotyped individuals based on genotyped relatives: assessing the imputation accuracy of a real case scenario in dairy cattle.
    Bouwman AC; Hickey JM; Calus MP; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):6. PubMed ID: 24490796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An ensemble-based approach to imputation of moderate-density genotypes for genomic selection with application to Angus cattle.
    Sun C; Wu XL; Weigel KA; Rosa GJ; Bauck S; Woodward BW; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF; Gianola D
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Jun; 94(3):133-50. PubMed ID: 22809677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) results.
    Henshall JM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():411-21. PubMed ID: 23756902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of different algorithms for phasing haplotypes using Holstein cattle genotypes and pedigree data.
    Miar Y; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Apr; 100(4):2837-2849. PubMed ID: 28161175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Graph-Based Imputation Methods and Their Applications to Single Donors and Families.
    Israeli S; Maiers M; Louzoun Y
    Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2809():193-214. PubMed ID: 38907899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.