These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23757462)

  • 1. The effects of two attachment types on the stresses introduced to the mandibular residual ridge: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Dashti MH; Atashrazm P; Emadi MI; Mishaeel S; Banava S
    Quintessence Int; 2013; 44(8):585-90. PubMed ID: 23757462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A three-dimensional finite element analysis for overdenture attachments supported by teeth and/or mini dental implants.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):604-13. PubMed ID: 22845394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of clip material and cross sections of the bar framework associated with vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-retained overdentures.
    dos Santos MB; Bacchi A; Correr-Sobrinho L; Consani RL
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 24392474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of stress patterns produced by implant-retained overdentures and implant-retained fixed partial denture.
    Mazaro JV; Filho HG; Vedovatto E; Pellizzer EP; Rezende MC; Zavanelli AC
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2153-7. PubMed ID: 22067869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implant-retained mandibular bar-supported overlay dentures: a finite element stress analysis of four different bar heights.
    Rismanchian M; Dakhilalian M; Bajoghli F; Ghasemi E; Sadr-Eshkevari P
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Apr; 38(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 20545552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
    Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overdenture retaining bar stress distribution: a finite-element analysis.
    Caetano CR; Mesquita MF; Consani RL; Correr-Sobrinho L; Dos Santos MB
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 May; 73(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 25645607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical behavior of mandibular overdenture retained by two standard implants or 2 mini implants: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Patil PG; Seow LL; Uddanwadikar R; Ukey PD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):138.e1-138.e8. PubMed ID: 33393474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems.
    Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 9638007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
    De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Load Transfer Characteristics of Various Designs of Three-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures.
    Tokar E; Uludag B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(5):1061-7. PubMed ID: 26394342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro study of a mandibular implant overdenture retained with ball, magnet, or bar attachments: comparison of load transfer and denture stability.
    Tokuhisa M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 12737242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strain characteristics of Marburg double crown-retained implant overdentures compared with bar and ball-retained implant overdentures, with and without a rigid major connector.
    Kazokoğlu FŞ; Akaltan F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1416-24. PubMed ID: 24969407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resilient liner vs. clip attachment effect on peri-implant tissues of bar-implant-retained mandibular overdenture: a 1-year clinical and radiographical study.
    Elsyad MA; Shoukouki AH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 May; 21(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 20443800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stress analysis of an overdenture using the finite element method.
    Gonda T; Dong J; Maeda Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(4):340-2. PubMed ID: 23837164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A preliminary three-dimensional finite element analysis of mandibular implant overdentures.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; Lu Y; Thiagarajan G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(1):70-2. PubMed ID: 24392480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Load Transfer Characteristics of Three-Implant-Retained Overdentures with Different Interimplant Distances.
    Tokar E; Uludag B; Karacaer O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):363-371. PubMed ID: 28291854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.