BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23758087)

  • 1. An improved inverse dynamics formulation for estimation of external and internal loads during human sagittal plane movements.
    Blajer W; Dziewiecki K; Mazur Z
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(4):362-75. PubMed ID: 23758087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inverse dynamics of mechanical multibody systems: An improved algorithm that ensures consistency between kinematics and external forces.
    Faber H; van Soest AJ; Kistemaker DA
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204575. PubMed ID: 30265727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative analysis of methods for estimating arm segment parameters and joint torques from inverse dynamics.
    Piovesan D; Pierobon A; Dizio P; Lackner JR
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Mar; 133(3):031003. PubMed ID: 21303179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cerebellar ataxia: abnormal control of interaction torques across multiple joints.
    Bastian AJ; Martin TA; Keating JG; Thach WT
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Jul; 76(1):492-509. PubMed ID: 8836239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inverse dynamic optimization including muscular dynamics, a new simulation method applied to goal directed movements.
    Happee R
    J Biomech; 1994 Jul; 27(7):953-60. PubMed ID: 8063845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cerebellar ataxia: torque deficiency or torque mismatch between joints?
    Bastian AJ; Zackowski KM; Thach WT
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 May; 83(5):3019-30. PubMed ID: 10805697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of the muscle force distribution in ballistic motion based on a multibody methodology.
    Czaplicki A; Silva M; Ambrósio J; Jesus O; Abrantes J
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 16880156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of global and joint-to-joint methods for estimating the hip joint load and the muscle forces during walking.
    Fraysse F; Dumas R; Cheze L; Wang X
    J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2357-62. PubMed ID: 19699479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lower extremity control and dynamics during backward angular impulse generation in backward translating tasks.
    Mathiyakom W; McNitt-Gray JL; Wilcox R
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 169(3):377-88. PubMed ID: 16273396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Muscle activities of the lower limb during level and uphill running.
    Yokozawa T; Fujii N; Ae M
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(15):3467-75. PubMed ID: 17662990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of mechanical energy expenditure of joint moments and muscle forces during human locomotion.
    Prilutsky BI; Petrova LN; Raitsin LM
    J Biomech; 1996 Apr; 29(4):405-15. PubMed ID: 8964770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Directional control of planar human arm movement.
    Gottlieb GL; Song Q; Almeida GL; Hong DA; Corcos D
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Dec; 78(6):2985-98. PubMed ID: 9405518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Joint torques in a freely walking insect reveal distinct functions of leg joints in propulsion and posture control.
    Dallmann CJ; Dürr V; Schmitz J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Jan; 283(1823):. PubMed ID: 26791608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modelling, simulation and optimisation of a human vertical jump.
    Spägele T; Kistner A; Gollhofer A
    J Biomech; 1999 May; 32(5):521-30. PubMed ID: 10327006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simultaneous Floating-Base Estimation of Human Kinematics and Joint Torques.
    Latella C; Traversaro S; Ferigo D; Tirupachuri Y; Rapetti L; Andrade Chavez FJ; Nori F; Pucci D
    Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jun; 19(12):. PubMed ID: 31234414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative study of impact dynamics: wobbling mass model versus rigid body models.
    Gruber K; Ruder H; Denoth J; Schneider K
    J Biomech; 1998 May; 31(5):439-44. PubMed ID: 9727341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are natural coordinates a useful tool in modeling planar biomechanical linkages?
    Czaplicki A
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(10):2307-12. PubMed ID: 17166498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimation of muscle forces in gait using a simulation of the electromyographic activity and numerical optimization.
    Ravera EP; Crespo MJ; Braidot AA
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2016; 19(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 25408069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are patient-specific joint and inertial parameters necessary for accurate inverse dynamics analyses of gait?
    Reinbolt JA; Haftka RT; Chmielewski TL; Fregly BJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 May; 54(5):782-93. PubMed ID: 17518274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A computational model for dynamic analysis of the human gait.
    Vimieiro C; Andrada E; Witte H; Pinotti M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(7):799-804. PubMed ID: 24156601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.