BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23758158)

  • 1. A pilot study to determine the validity and reliability of the Level of Reflection-on-Action Assessment.
    Padden ML
    J Nurs Educ; 2013 Jul; 52(7):410-5. PubMed ID: 23758158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method for assessing reflective journal writing.
    Plack MM; Driscoll M; Blissett S; McKenna R; Plack TP
    J Allied Health; 2005; 34(4):199-208. PubMed ID: 16529182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulation With Debriefing and Guided Reflective Journaling to Stimulate Critical Thinking in Prelicensure Baccalaureate Degree Nursing Students.
    Padden-Denmead ML; Scaffidi RM; Kerley RM; Farside AL
    J Nurs Educ; 2016 Nov; 55(11):645-650. PubMed ID: 27783819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Critical thinking evaluation in reflective writing: Development and testing of Carter Assessment of Critical Thinking in Midwifery (Reflection).
    Carter AG; Creedy DK; Sidebotham M
    Midwifery; 2017 Nov; 54():73-80. PubMed ID: 28866350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing reflective writing on a pediatric clerkship by using a modified Bloom's Taxonomy.
    Plack MM; Driscoll M; Marquez M; Cuppernull L; Maring J; Greenberg L
    Ambul Pediatr; 2007; 7(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 17660099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring the Level of Reflective Ability of Predoctoral Dental Students: Early Outcomes in an e-Portfolio Reflection.
    Gadbury-Amyot CC; Godley LW; Nelson JW
    J Dent Educ; 2019 Mar; 83(3):275-280. PubMed ID: 30692189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reflective journal prompts: a vehicle for stimulating emotional competence in nursing.
    Harrison PA; Fopma-Loy JL
    J Nurs Educ; 2010 Nov; 49(11):644-52. PubMed ID: 20669871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychometric testing of the Pecka Grading Rubric for evaluating higher-order thinking in distance learning.
    Pecka S; Schmid K; Pozehl B
    AANA J; 2014 Dec; 82(6):449-56. PubMed ID: 25842643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inter-rater reliability of a reflective rubric to assess pharmacy students' reflective thinking.
    Lucas C; Bosnic-Anticevich S; Schneider CR; Bartimote-Aufflick K; McEntee M; Smith L
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2017 Nov; 9(6):989-995. PubMed ID: 29233396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Essential steps in developing best practices to assess reflective skill: A comparison of two rubrics.
    Miller-Kuhlmann R; O'Sullivan PS; Aronson L
    Med Teach; 2016; 38(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 25923234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The development of a quantitative evaluation tool for simulations in nursing education.
    Todd M; Manz JA; Hawkins KS; Parsons ME; Hercinger M
    Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh; 2008; 5():Article 41. PubMed ID: 19049492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Considerations in the use of reflective writing for student assessment: issues of reliability and validity.
    Moniz T; Arntfield S; Miller K; Lingard L; Watling C; Regehr G
    Med Educ; 2015 Sep; 49(9):901-8. PubMed ID: 26296406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evaluation of students' reflective writing for evidence of critical thinking.
    Kennison MM
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2006; 27(5):269-73. PubMed ID: 17036685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reflective teaching of medical communication skills with DiViDU: assessing the level of student reflection on recorded consultations with simulated patients.
    Hulsman RL; Harmsen AB; Fabriek M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Feb; 74(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 19062232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and testing of a portfolio evaluation scoring tool.
    Karlowicz KA
    J Nurs Educ; 2010 Feb; 49(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 19810669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A qualitative tool for critical thinking skill development.
    Cise JS; Wilson CS; Thie MJ
    Nurse Educ; 2004; 29(4):147-51. PubMed ID: 15273593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the reliability, validity, and use of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric: three approaches.
    Adamson KA; Gubrud P; Sideras S; Lasater K
    J Nurs Educ; 2012 Feb; 51(2):66-73. PubMed ID: 22132718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of brief written educational material to promote reflection amongst trained nurses: a pilot study.
    Spencer N; Newell R
    Nurse Educ Today; 1999 Jul; 19(5):347-56. PubMed ID: 10693482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-assessment and reflection in nurse education.
    Price B
    Nurs Stand; 2005 Mar 30-Apr 5; 19(29):33-7. PubMed ID: 15819331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can a reflective rubric be applied consistently with raters globally? A study across three countries.
    Lucas C; Smith L; Lonie JM; Hough M; Rogers K; Mantzourani E
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2019 Oct; 11(10):987-994. PubMed ID: 31685182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.