BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23758539)

  • 1. Choosing vs. allocating: discrete choice experiments and constant-sum paired comparisons for the elicitation of societal preferences.
    Skedgel CD; Wailoo AJ; Akehurst RL
    Health Expect; 2015 Oct; 18(5):1227-40. PubMed ID: 23758539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Constant-sum paired comparisons for eliciting stated preferences: a tutorial.
    Skedgel C; Regier DA
    Patient; 2015 Apr; 8(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 25038741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are some QALYs more equal than others?
    van de Wetering EJ; van Exel NJ; Rose JM; Hoefman RJ; Brouwer WB
    Eur J Health Econ; 2016 Mar; 17(2):117-27. PubMed ID: 25479937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing Discrete Choice Experiment with Swing Weighting to Estimate Attribute Relative Importance: A Case Study in Lung Cancer Patient Preferences.
    Veldwijk J; Smith IP; Oliveri S; Petrocchi S; Smith MY; Lanzoni L; Janssens R; Huys I; de Wit GA; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
    Med Decis Making; 2024 Feb; 44(2):203-216. PubMed ID: 38178591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Women's preferences for attributes of first-trimester miscarriage management: a stated preference discrete-choice experiment.
    Petrou S; McIntosh E
    Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 18798807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing Analytic Hierarchy Process and Discrete-Choice Experiment to Elicit Patient Preferences for Treatment Characteristics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
    Danner M; Vennedey V; Hiligsmann M; Fauser S; Gross C; Stock S
    Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1166-1173. PubMed ID: 28964450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
    Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a Discrete-Choice Experiment (DCE) to Elicit Adolescent and Parent Preferences for Hypodontia Treatment.
    Barber S; Bekker H; Marti J; Pavitt S; Khambay B; Meads D
    Patient; 2019 Feb; 12(1):137-148. PubMed ID: 30367434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Societal Preferences for Interventions with the Same Efficiency: Assessment and Application to Decision Making.
    Shiroiwa T; Saito S; Shimozuma K; Kodama S; Noto S; Fukuda T
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2016 Jun; 14(3):375-85. PubMed ID: 26940671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Societal preferences for distributive justice in the allocation of health care resources: a latent class discrete choice experiment.
    Skedgel C; Wailoo A; Akehurst R
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Jan; 35(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 25145575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing Preferences for Disease Profiles: A Discrete Choice Experiment from a US Societal Perspective.
    Johnston KM; Audhya IF; Dunne J; Feeny D; Neumann P; Malone DC; Szabo SM; Gooch KL
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2024 May; 22(3):343-352. PubMed ID: 38253973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the inclusion of a cost attribute result in different preferences for the surgical treatment of primary basal cell carcinoma?: a comparison of two discrete-choice experiments.
    Essers BA; van Helvoort-Postulart D; Prins MH; Neumann M; Dirksen CD
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(6):507-20. PubMed ID: 20387912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the impact of excluded attributes on choice in a discrete choice experiment using a follow-up question.
    Mansfield C; Sutphin J; Boeri M
    Health Econ; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1307-1315. PubMed ID: 32627284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are Efficient Designs Used in Discrete Choice Experiments Too Difficult for Some Respondents? A Case Study Eliciting Preferences for End-of-Life Care.
    Flynn TN; Bilger M; Malhotra C; Finkelstein EA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2016 Mar; 34(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 26589411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preferences heterogeneity of health care utilization of community residents in China: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.
    Jiang MZ; Fu Q; Xiong JY; Li XL; Jia EP; Peng YY; Shen X
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 May; 20(1):430. PubMed ID: 32423447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mobilising the Next Generation of Stated-Preference Studies: the Association of Access Device with Choice Behaviour and Data Quality.
    Vass CM; Boeri M
    Patient; 2021 Jan; 14(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 33355916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mimicking Real-Life Decision Making in Health: Allowing Respondents Time to Think in a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Veldwijk J; Johansson JV; Donkers B; de Bekker-Grob EW
    Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):945-952. PubMed ID: 32762997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recombinant erythropoietin for chemotherapy-related anaemia: economic value and health-related quality-of-life assessment using direct utility elicitation and discrete choice experiment methods.
    Ossa DF; Briggs A; McIntosh E; Cowell W; Littlewood T; Sculpher M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2007; 25(3):223-37. PubMed ID: 17335308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decision-makers' preferences for approving new medicines in Wales: a discrete-choice experiment with assessment of external validity.
    Linley WG; Hughes DA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Apr; 31(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 23516033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patients' preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments.
    Kleij KS; Tangermann U; Amelung VE; Krauth C
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jul; 17(1):476. PubMed ID: 28697796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.